BENCHMARKING AUDIT Financial | Operational | Strategy
Assess how your business performance compares to industry benchmarks. Identify where you are behind, where you lead, and where data is missing. Used to prioritise improvement actions with evidence.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Financial Benchmarking

🎯
SCOPE
Revenue, margin, and cost structure vs. industry averages
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is your gross margin vs. the industry average, and what explains the gap?
High
Don't just identify the gap — identify the structural cause. Is it pricing, product mix, input costs, or scale?
DATA SOURCE P&L Statement, Industry Report
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
How does EBITDA margin compare to sector peers, and is the gap widening or narrowing?
High
3
What is revenue per FTE vs. the industry benchmark, and which departments drag this down?
Medium
4
What is overhead cost as % of revenue vs. benchmark, and which overhead categories are above norm?
Medium
5
What is debtor days (DSO) vs. the industry average, and which customer segments drive the gap?
High
6
What is net profit margin vs. comparable companies, adjusted for capital structure?
High
7
Is the reinvestment rate (capex + R&D as % of revenue) in line with industry norms for sustained competitiveness?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Operational Benchmarking

🎯
SCOPE
Productivity, throughput, and process efficiency vs. peers
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is output per productive FTE vs. the sector benchmark, and which shifts or lines underperform?
High
Aggregate productivity numbers mask shift or line-level variation. Identify the best unit, then gap-analyse the rest.
DATA SOURCE Production data, HR
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is order-to-delivery lead time vs. competitors, and where in the process does time accumulate?
High
3
What is first-pass quality rate vs. industry norm, and at which process stage do defects originate?
High
4
What is inventory turnover vs. sector average, and is slow-moving stock being actively managed?
Medium
5
What is the planned vs. unplanned maintenance ratio vs. industry best practice?
Medium
6
What is energy cost per unit of output vs. benchmark, and which processes consume disproportionately?
Low
7
What is waste/scrap rate vs. the sector standard, and what is the annual cost of this gap?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Commercial Benchmarking

🎯
SCOPE
Sales performance, pricing power, and market position vs. peers
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is customer acquisition cost (CAC) vs. benchmark, and which channels drive CAC above or below norm?
High
CAC by channel is far more useful than blended CAC. High-CAC channels may still be justified by higher lifetime value.
DATA SOURCE CRM, P&L
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the win rate on proposals vs. industry norm, and at which stage of the funnel do losses occur?
High
3
What is average revenue per customer vs. comparable companies, and is it growing or shrinking?
High
4
What is customer retention rate vs. benchmark, and what are the top 3 stated reasons for churn?
High
5
What is the ratio of new business revenue to total revenue vs. industry norms?
Medium
6
What is the pricing premium or discount vs. market average, and is it intentional or structural?
Medium
7
What is the number of active products/SKUs vs. benchmark, and is complexity delivering margin or destroying it?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Strategic Positioning & Competitor Gap

🎯
SCOPE
Market share, competitive differentiation, and strategic performance
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is your market share vs. top 3 competitors, and has it changed in the last 24 months?
High
Market share trend matters more than absolute position. Losing 2% per year compounding is a strategic crisis in 5 years.
DATA SOURCE Market research, Sales data
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
How does your Net Promoter Score (NPS) compare to sector benchmark and key competitors?
High
3
What is your product/service development cycle time vs. competitors?
Medium
4
Are your key competitive differentiators validated by customer data, or assumed by management?
High
5
What is your geographic market coverage vs. key competitors, and where are white-space gaps?
Medium
6
How does your digital capability (e-commerce, CX, data) compare to sector leaders?
Medium
7
What is your talent acquisition cost and time-to-hire vs. industry benchmark?
Low
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Financial Benchmarking
Operational Benchmarking
Commercial Benchmarking
Strategic Positioning & Competitor Gap
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
14
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
COST REDUCTION AUDIT Financial | Operational
Identify structural cost reduction opportunities without damaging performance or customer value. Focuses on root causes and sustainable savings, not one-off cuts.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Cost Structure & Overhead

🎯
SCOPE
Fixed and semi-fixed cost structure vs. revenue and output
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What are the top 10 cost lines by value, and which have grown faster than revenue in the last 3 years?
High
Cost growth that outpaces revenue growth is structural deterioration. Each line above revenue growth rate is a priority.
DATA SOURCE P&L, Management accounts
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Which fixed costs remain unchanged regardless of revenue decline — and what is the minimum revenue floor to cover them?
High
3
Are there overhead functions where headcount has grown without a corresponding increase in output or revenue?
High
4
Which subscriptions, software licences, and recurring service contracts have not been reviewed in the past 18 months?
Medium
5
What is the cost of non-productive space — empty offices, unused warehousing, or idle plant?
Medium
6
Are there shared service functions that could be centralised or outsourced at lower cost?
Medium
7
What is the total cost of compliance and reporting activities, and is that cost proportionate to business scale?
Low
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Procurement & Supplier Costs

🎯
SCOPE
External spend on goods, services, and logistics
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
When were your top 10 supplier contracts last renegotiated, and what are current rates vs. market?
High
Most supplier contracts auto-renew without challenge. Benchmarking current rates against market takes hours and typically yields 5–15% savings.
DATA SOURCE Contract register, Market data
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What percentage of total spend is with single-source suppliers, and what is the risk/cost premium you pay for this?
High
3
Are volume discounts being fully utilised, and is purchasing fragmented across locations or buyers?
Medium
4
What is the total cost of inbound logistics, and have freight/carrier rates been reviewed in the last 12 months?
High
5
What is the cost of inventory obsolescence and write-offs annually, and what is causing it?
Medium
6
Are there categories of spend where specification quality exceeds what is actually required?
Medium
7
Is there a preferred supplier programme, and does it actually deliver cost and quality consistency?
Low
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Labour & Productivity Costs

🎯
SCOPE
Labour cost efficiency and workforce productivity
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the cost per productive hour, and how does it compare to 3 years ago and to the sector?
High
Rising cost-per-productive-hour without productivity gains means the business is paying more for the same output.
DATA SOURCE Payroll, HR data, Production data
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the total cost of absenteeism — direct pay, replacement cover, and output loss?
High
3
Are there roles or job families with utilisation below 70%, and what is the structural cause?
Medium
4
What is the total spend on temporary and agency labour, and what is driving the dependency?
High
5
What is the overtime cost, and is it being used to compensate for understaffing or poor scheduling?
Medium
6
Are there activities currently done by senior roles that could be redistributed to lower-cost resources?
Medium
7
What is the total training spend, and is it generating measurable productivity or capability uplift?
Low
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Hidden Cost & Waste Elimination

🎯
SCOPE
Non-obvious costs embedded in processes, systems, and decisions
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the total cost of rework, complaints, and quality failures annually?
High
Cost of poor quality (COPQ) typically runs at 5–15% of revenue in manufacturers. It is rarely measured and almost never managed.
DATA SOURCE Quality reports, Finance, CRM
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the cost of expediting — rush orders, urgent freight, and last-minute changes?
High
3
Are there internal approval processes that add time and cost without adding risk control?
Medium
4
What is the cost of maintaining legacy systems, workarounds, and manual patches on old technology?
Medium
5
How much management time is spent in reporting activities that do not drive decisions?
Medium
6
Are customer-facing processes creating costs through complexity that customers don't value?
High
7
What is the total cost of failed projects and initiatives in the last 3 years?
Low
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Cost Structure & Overhead
Procurement & Supplier Costs
Labour & Productivity Costs
Hidden Cost & Waste Elimination
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
12
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
KPI DASHBOARD AUDIT Operational | Financial | Strategy
Evaluate whether the right KPIs are tracked, reported accurately, and actively used to drive decisions. A KPI system nobody acts on is not a management system — it is a reporting exercise.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

KPI Selection & Strategic Alignment

🎯
SCOPE
Whether current KPIs are the right ones for the business strategy
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Does every KPI link directly and visibly to a stated strategic objective?
High
Map each KPI to a strategic goal. KPIs with no strategic link are either orphaned metrics or the strategy is incomplete.
DATA SOURCE Strategy document, KPI register
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are there strategic objectives with no KPI assigned to them?
High
3
What is the ratio of leading to lagging indicators in the current dashboard?
High
4
How many KPIs are tracked in total, and can each manager name the top 5 that matter most?
Medium
5
Are KPIs set to differentiate high from mediocre performance, or are targets set to guarantee achievement?
High
6
Are customer-experience KPIs given equal weight to financial KPIs in management review?
Medium
7
When was the KPI set last reviewed for continued relevance, and what changed in the business since then?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Data Quality & Measurement Integrity

🎯
SCOPE
Accuracy, timeliness, and consistency of KPI data
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are KPI definitions documented with a consistent formula, source, and owner for each metric?
High
Different teams calculating the same KPI differently makes management discussion meaningless. Test this by asking two teams to independently calculate the same metric.
DATA SOURCE KPI definitions document
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Which KPIs are calculated manually, and how often do manual errors affect the reported number?
High
3
How long does it take to produce the monthly management report, and what causes the longest delays?
Medium
4
Are there known data quality issues affecting any current KPIs, and are these disclosed in reports?
High
5
Are source systems (ERP, CRM, HRIS) integrated, or are data exports and manual reconciliations required?
Medium
6
Is KPI data audited periodically for accuracy, and by whom?
Medium
7
Are there KPIs where the data source has changed without a restatement of prior-period comparisons?
Low
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Usage & Decision-Making Impact

🎯
SCOPE
How KPIs drive management decisions and operational actions
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
In the last 3 management reviews, how many agenda items were directly triggered by a KPI moving off target?
High
This is the real test of a KPI system. If KPI movements don't drive agenda items, the system is decorative.
DATA SOURCE Meeting minutes
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is there a defined escalation process when a KPI breaches a threshold, and is it consistently applied?
High
3
Does every KPI have a single named owner accountable for performance, with authority to act?
High
4
Are front-line teams shown the KPIs they directly influence, with enough frequency to change behaviour?
Medium
5
Is there evidence that KPI trends have changed management decisions about investment, staffing, or pricing?
High
6
Are KPIs used in performance conversations with individual managers, linked to objectives and accountability?
Medium
7
Is there a mechanism to raise concerns about KPI targets being gamed or manipulated?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

KPI Governance & Continuous Improvement

🎯
SCOPE
Review cycle, ownership, and evolution of the KPI framework
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a defined review cycle for the KPI framework, and who has authority to add, remove, or change KPIs?
Medium
Without governance, KPI sets grow uncontrolled or become outdated. Authority to change must be explicit.
DATA SOURCE KPI governance document
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
How are new KPIs validated before being added to the management dashboard?
Medium
3
Are KPI targets benchmarked externally or only set relative to last year's actuals?
High
4
Is there a process to identify KPI blind spots — risks or opportunities not currently being measured?
High
5
Are KPI reports distributed to the right people at the right frequency, or is the same report sent to everyone?
Low
6
Is there a documented link between KPI performance and strategic planning assumptions?
Medium
7
Are board-level KPIs aligned with operational KPIs, or do they measure different things?
High
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
KPI Selection & Strategic Alignment
Data Quality & Measurement Integrity
Usage & Decision-Making Impact
KPI Governance & Continuous Improvement
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
14
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
PRODUCTIVITY AUDIT Operational | HR/People
Identify productivity blockers at team, process, and system level. Focus is on output per hour, not hours worked. Organisations that improve productivity create capacity without adding headcount.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Output & Capacity Utilisation

🎯
SCOPE
Actual output levels, capacity usage, and productivity baseline
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is actual output per FTE per week, and how does it vary across teams, shifts, or locations?
High
Aggregate productivity hides variation. The gap between your best and worst units reveals the improvement potential from levelling up.
DATA SOURCE Production data, HR data
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What percentage of working time is spent on activities that directly create customer or financial value?
High
3
What are the top 3 causes of lost productive time, quantified in hours and cost per week?
High
4
Is demand-side variability (seasonal, weekly, daily) causing systematic over or under-capacity?
Medium
5
What is the ratio of direct productive roles to support and overhead roles, and has it shifted over 3 years?
Medium
6
Are productivity targets set per role, and how often are they reviewed against actual output?
High
7
What is the cost of unplanned absence on daily output, and is there a contingency staffing plan?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Tools, Systems & Technology

🎯
SCOPE
Technology and system-level productivity enablers and blockers
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the top system or tool complaint cited by employees as slowing them down?
High
Ask employees directly, not managers. The answer is usually specific: a slow system, a missing integration, a broken process.
DATA SOURCE Employee survey, IT helpdesk logs
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
How many hours per week per FTE are lost to system downtime, slow performance, or workarounds?
High
3
Which repetitive, rule-based tasks are still done manually that could be automated?
Medium
4
Is information easy to find, or do employees regularly spend time locating documents, contacts, or data?
Medium
5
Are employees trained to use systems to their capability, or only to perform their own task flow?
Medium
6
Are there shadow IT tools (personal spreadsheets, WhatsApp groups, personal Dropboxes) compensating for system gaps?
High
7
What is the ratio of IT support tickets to FTE count, and is it trending up or down?
Low
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Meeting & Communication Overhead

🎯
SCOPE
Time consumed by meetings, emails, and communication overhead
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the average number of hours per week spent in meetings by function, and how does this compare across levels?
High
Senior managers often average 25–35 hours/week in meetings. At that point, meeting attendance is the job, not a support activity.
DATA SOURCE Calendar analysis, Survey
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What percentage of meetings end with documented decisions and assigned actions?
High
3
Are there recurring meetings that have not been evaluated for necessity in the past year?
Medium
4
How much time do managers spend preparing for internal reporting vs. customer-facing or value-creating activities?
Medium
5
Is there a cultural expectation to respond to messages immediately, and does this fragment deep-work time?
Medium
6
Are decision rights clear enough that communication volume is driven by information-sharing, not permission-seeking?
High
7
Do remote or hybrid workers face higher communication overhead than on-site workers, and what is the productivity effect?
Low
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Workflow Design & Process Bottlenecks

🎯
SCOPE
How work flows through the organisation and where it stalls
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Where in the key process flows does work queue most frequently, and for how long?
High
Queue time is wasted time. Map the top 3 core processes and identify where work sits waiting — for approval, information, or resource.
DATA SOURCE Process maps, ERP/workflow data
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are handover points between departments or roles documented with clear inputs, outputs, and timing expectations?
High
3
What is the average rework rate in key processes, and what is the primary upstream cause?
High
4
Are processes designed around the most common scenario or around exceptions, and what is the cost of exception handling?
Medium
5
Are approval and sign-off chains proportionate to the risk and value of the decision being approved?
Medium
6
Is there a defined process improvement mechanism — a way for employees to flag and resolve inefficiencies?
Medium
7
What percentage of process steps in key workflows are documented in current, accessible SOPs?
Low
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Output & Capacity Utilisation
Tools, Systems & Technology
Meeting & Communication Overhead
Workflow Design & Process Bottlenecks
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
13
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
BUSINESS PERFORMANCE REVIEW AUDIT Financial | Strategy | Operational
Structured review of overall business performance across financial, commercial, and operational dimensions. Use quarterly to maintain strategic alignment and identify early warning signals.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Financial Performance

🎯
SCOPE
Revenue, margin, cash, and balance sheet health
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is revenue on track vs. plan, and what is the structural vs. timing cause of any variance?
High
Split variance into price, volume, and mix effects. A mix shift to lower-margin products is structurally different from a timing delay.
DATA SOURCE P&L, Budget
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is gross margin stable or improving, and has product/service mix contributed positively or negatively?
High
3
Is operating cash flow positive, and does it cover debt service, capex, and working capital needs?
High
4
Are debtor days trending up or down, and which customer segments or geographies are driving the movement?
High
5
What is working capital as a percentage of revenue, and is it increasing faster than the business is growing?
High
6
Are there any covenant breaches or near-covenant risks on existing credit facilities?
High
7
What is the variance between cash profit (EBITDA) and actual cash generated, and what explains the gap?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Commercial Performance

🎯
SCOPE
Pipeline, customer segments, pricing, and market position
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is the sales pipeline healthy, and does it provide sufficient coverage for the next 2 quarters?
High
Pipeline coverage ratio should be 3× target revenue for the period. Below 2× is a forward revenue risk requiring immediate action.
DATA SOURCE CRM
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Which customer segments or product lines are growing, and which are in structural decline?
High
3
What is the customer retention rate this period, and what are the specific reasons for accounts lost?
High
4
Are the top 5 customers growing, stable, or declining in spend, and what is the account health signal?
High
5
What is the conversion rate from proposal to closed deal, and has it changed in the last 6 months?
Medium
6
Is new business revenue sufficient to replace natural churn and grow the customer base?
High
7
Are pricing and discounting decisions being made consistently and within defined authority levels?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Operational Performance

🎯
SCOPE
Delivery, quality, capacity, and people performance
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the on-time delivery rate, and where in the process do delays originate?
High
OTD below 90% in most industries signals a systemic planning or capacity problem, not isolated incidents.
DATA SOURCE Operations data, ERP
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the quality complaint rate per 1,000 orders or transactions, and is it trending up or down?
High
3
Are there capacity constraints — in production, logistics, or staffing — that are limiting revenue growth?
High
4
What is staff turnover by department, and are any functions above the sector average?
Medium
5
What is the utilisation rate of key production assets or infrastructure, and is it optimised?
Medium
6
Are supplier delivery performance and quality meeting the standards required to serve your customers?
High
7
What is the Net Promoter Score or customer satisfaction score this period, and what is driving movement?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Strategic Outlook & Risk

🎯
SCOPE
Forward-looking risks, strategic progress, and decision priorities
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What are the top 3 risks to achieving the next 12-month plan, and what is the current mitigation status?
High
Naming risks without tracking mitigation status is incomplete governance. Each risk needs an owner, a response, and a monitoring trigger.
DATA SOURCE Risk register, Management review
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are any strategic initiatives on track — on time, on budget, and delivering expected business impact?
High
3
What external market changes — customer behaviour, competition, regulation — are affecting the plan?
High
4
Is the current capital allocation — across maintenance, growth, and transformation — appropriate for the strategy?
Medium
5
Are there decisions being delayed that are consuming management attention and creating uncertainty?
High
6
What is the current talent risk — key person dependencies, succession gaps, and skills shortages?
Medium
7
Is the business model remaining relevant, or are there structural changes in the market that require strategic response?
High
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Financial Performance
Commercial Performance
Operational Performance
Strategic Outlook & Risk
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
20
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
CROSS-CULTURAL BUSINESS AUDIT Strategy | HR/People
Assess readiness for cross-cultural business: communication, decision-making styles, negotiation, and team integration across cultural boundaries. Critical for international expansion and partnership success.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Cultural Intelligence & Business Awareness

🎯
SCOPE
Team's knowledge of and adaptability to target market cultures
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Does the team engaging in cross-cultural business have documented cultural briefings for each target market?
High
Generic cultural awareness is insufficient. Specific briefings on business etiquette, hierarchy norms, and communication expectations per country reduce costly missteps.
DATA SOURCE HR training records, Commercial team
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the process for verifying that assumptions about a foreign counterpart's expectations are correct vs. assumed?
High
3
Are local advisors or cultural brokers engaged for markets where the team has limited experience?
Medium
4
How is the team's cultural intelligence formally assessed, and who is currently rated capable for which markets?
Medium
5
What formal mechanisms exist to capture and share learnings from past cross-cultural interactions — successful or not?
Low
6
Are marketing and sales materials adapted for each cultural market, not just translated?
High
7
Is the company's legal and contractual approach adapted for jurisdictional and cultural differences in enforcement?
High
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Communication Style Adaptation

🎯
SCOPE
Communication effectiveness across cultural and language boundaries
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are written communications reviewed for cultural appropriateness before being sent to key cross-cultural counterparts?
High
Directness, formality, tone, and even paragraph structure carry different signals in different cultures. High-value communications should be reviewed.
DATA SOURCE Commercial process
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is there clarity within the team on what constitutes a 'yes', 'maybe', and 'no' in different cultural communication styles?
High
3
How are language barriers managed in technical or contractual discussions where precision is critical?
Medium
4
Are written follow-ups used consistently after verbal agreements in cross-cultural contexts?
Medium
5
Are communication frequency and channel preferences adapted per cultural partner?
Medium
6
Are presentations and proposals formatted to match the decision-making style of the target culture?
Medium
7
Is there a process for checking that key messages have been understood as intended, not just received?
Low
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Negotiation & Decision-Making Style

🎯
SCOPE
Cross-cultural differences in how decisions are made and negotiations are conducted
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is the team aware of the decision-making authority level of their counterparts — and is this confirmed, not assumed?
High
Negotiating with someone who lacks authority to decide wastes time and creates false confidence in agreed positions.
DATA SOURCE Commercial process, Meeting records
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are negotiation timelines calibrated to the typical decision speed of the target culture?
High
3
What is the team's protocol for making and receiving concessions in a cross-cultural negotiation?
High
4
Is the role of relationship-building formally recognised and resourced in the commercial approach to each market?
High
5
How are deadlock situations handled in negotiations with cultural counterparts where face-saving is critical?
Medium
6
Is there a process to verify whether a signed agreement will be implemented as understood by both parties?
Medium
7
Are negotiating teams composition and seniority matched appropriately to the counterpart's expectations?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Team Integration & Organisational Culture Fit

🎯
SCOPE
Managing multicultural teams and integrating cultural differences internally
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
In multicultural teams, are differences in communication and working styles acknowledged and actively managed?
High
Unmanaged style differences create friction disguised as performance problems. Name the style differences and build explicit working agreements.
DATA SOURCE HR, Team management
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is leadership style adapted to cultural expectations of team members from different backgrounds?
High
3
Are performance expectations and feedback practices culturally calibrated, or applied uniformly?
High
4
Are there measurable inclusion indicators for multicultural teams — voice, promotion, retention by cultural group?
Medium
5
Is there a formal onboarding process that addresses cultural integration for internationally placed staff?
Medium
6
Are conflict resolution mechanisms culturally appropriate, and do team members trust them to work fairly?
Medium
7
Is cultural competence included in leadership development and succession planning criteria?
Low
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Cultural Intelligence & Business Awareness
Communication Style Adaptation
Negotiation & Decision-Making Style
Team Integration & Organisational Culture Fit
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
13
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
DEALER ONBOARDING AUDIT Sales & Marketing | Operational
Assess the effectiveness of the process for qualifying, activating, and developing new dealers. A weak onboarding process produces dealers who never reach commercial potential or who represent the brand poorly.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Qualification & Selection Criteria

🎯
SCOPE
How new dealers are identified and evaluated before appointment
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a documented dealer profile that defines the minimum commercial, financial, and operational requirements for appointment?
High
Without a minimum standard, channel decisions are made on convenience or relationship rather than capability. The profile should include financial health, market coverage, and technical capacity.
DATA SOURCE Channel policy, Sales process
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are prospective dealers assessed against the profile before appointment, with documented evidence?
High
3
What is the financial health check process for new dealer candidates?
High
4
Is market coverage analysis conducted before appointment to confirm the dealer covers the intended territory?
Medium
5
Are existing dealers consulted or informed before a new dealer is appointed in overlapping territories?
Medium
6
Is there a defined maximum number of dealers per territory, and is this ceiling being managed?
Medium
7
Are the expected results and timeline for a new dealer made explicit before signing the appointment agreement?
High
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Onboarding Process & Materials

🎯
SCOPE
What happens from appointment to first sale
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a structured onboarding programme with defined milestones, responsibilities, and timelines?
High
An onboarding programme that exists only as a welcome call and a product brochure is not a programme. Define what must happen, by when, and who is responsible.
DATA SOURCE Onboarding process, CRM
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are product and technical training materials available in the dealer's language?
High
3
Does the new dealer receive a dedicated contact person for the first 90 days of onboarding?
High
4
Are brand guidelines, visual identity, and communication standards provided with clear compliance requirements?
Medium
5
Is the dealer's marketing territory officially communicated and confirmed in writing?
High
6
Is there a defined product assortment recommendation for the new dealer's market and customer profile?
Medium
7
Are pricing policies, discount structures, and payment terms explained in writing before first order?
High
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Training & Technical Competency

🎯
SCOPE
Product knowledge, technical capability, and sales readiness
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a defined product certification or competency test that new dealers must pass before selling?
High
Certifying dealer sales and technical staff before selling protects both the brand and the end customer. Without certification, quality is uncontrolled.
DATA SOURCE Training programme, CRM
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are training completion records maintained for each dealer contact, and linked to performance expectations?
Medium
3
Is dealer training available in digital, self-paced format as well as classroom or face-to-face?
Medium
4
How often is product training content updated when new products are launched or specifications change?
High
5
Are dealers trained on your sales methodology — not just the product, but how to sell it in their market?
Medium
6
What is the pass rate on dealer certification, and is it used to identify dealers at risk of underperformance?
Medium
7
Is there a refresher training programme for existing dealer staff as products and markets evolve?
Low
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

First 90 Days Performance

🎯
SCOPE
Early commercial activity and milestone achievement post-appointment
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are first 90-day commercial milestones defined for each new dealer, and reviewed at day 30, 60, and 90?
High
Three checkpoints in the first 90 days allow early intervention before a dealer falls permanently below expectation.
DATA SOURCE Onboarding tracker, CRM
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the average time from dealer appointment to first order, and how does it compare to target?
High
3
Is there a defined intervention process for new dealers who are below milestone at day 60?
High
4
Are new dealers introduced to key contacts in your organisation — logistics, technical support, finance — in the first 30 days?
Medium
5
What feedback do new dealers give about the onboarding process, and is it formally collected?
Medium
6
Is the first 90-day joint business plan agreed in writing before or immediately after appointment?
High
7
What is the 12-month retention rate of dealers recruited in the last 3 years, and what are the primary exit reasons?
High
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Qualification & Selection Criteria
Onboarding Process & Materials
Training & Technical Competency
First 90 Days Performance
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
16
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
DISTRIBUTOR DEVELOPMENT AUDIT Sales & Marketing | Strategy
Evaluate the depth and effectiveness of your distributor relationships. Goes beyond sales performance to assess capability, investment, joint planning, and long-term development trajectory.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Distributor Selection & Qualification

🎯
SCOPE
How distributors are assessed, selected, and appointed
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a formal distributor selection criteria framework, and is it applied consistently before appointment?
High
Inconsistent selection criteria lead to inconsistent performance. A framework must include financial health, market coverage, technical capability, and strategic fit.
DATA SOURCE Channel policy, Selection records
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are distributor financial statements reviewed as part of the selection process?
High
3
Is the distributor's current portfolio of brands assessed for conflict or complementarity with your offering?
High
4
Is the distributor's existing customer base verified as matching your target segment?
Medium
5
Are distributor references — from other brand principals they represent — obtained and verified?
Medium
6
Is the distributor's technical and after-sales capability assessed, not just their sales capacity?
High
7
What is the average tenure of distributors in your network, and does short tenure indicate a systemic selection problem?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Commercial Agreement & Structure

🎯
SCOPE
The terms, incentives, and governance of the distributor relationship
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are distributor agreements current, signed, and inclusive of current territory, product, and performance terms?
High
Outdated or unsigned agreements leave the relationship unprotected. Annual review of agreement currency is minimum governance.
DATA SOURCE Contract register, Legal
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Do distributor agreements include minimum purchase commitments tied to market development plans?
High
3
Is the pricing structure — including distributor margin, end-customer price guidance, and escalation rights — clearly defined?
High
4
Are exclusivity terms — where granted — tied to performance conditions with clear exit provisions?
High
5
What is the termination notice period and process, and has it been tested in recent contract reviews?
Medium
6
Are incentive structures (rebates, co-marketing funds, training support) tied to measurable outcomes?
Medium
7
Is there a defined process for resolving commercial disputes with distributors, including escalation levels?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Performance Management & Accountability

🎯
SCOPE
How distributor performance is measured, reviewed, and managed
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are distributor sales targets set annually with quarterly milestones, and reviewed formally at each checkpoint?
High
Annual targets without quarterly milestones cannot be managed. Quarterly reviews create the cadence needed for course correction.
DATA SOURCE Sales data, CRM
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the process when a distributor misses target for two consecutive quarters?
High
3
Are KPIs tracked beyond sales volume — including market coverage, customer satisfaction, and sell-through rates?
High
4
Are distributor sales force activity levels (calls, demos, proposals) tracked and benchmarked?
Medium
5
How are high-performing and low-performing distributors identified and treated differently?
Medium
6
Is there a formal distributor scorecard reviewed at each business review meeting?
High
7
What is the process for exiting an underperforming distributor, and has it been used in the last 3 years?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Development & Growth Support

🎯
SCOPE
Investment in distributor capability and long-term partnership growth
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there an annual joint business plan agreed with each distributor, with mutual investment commitments?
High
A joint business plan creates shared ownership of results. One-sided plans where only the distributor commits are not partnerships.
DATA SOURCE Commercial process, CRM
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What training and capability development is provided to distributor sales and technical teams?
High
3
Are co-marketing funds available to distributors, and are they conditioned on activities with measurable commercial return?
Medium
4
What is the process for sharing market intelligence with distributors to help them identify opportunities?
Medium
5
Are distributors involved in product development feedback loops and new product launch planning?
Medium
6
What digital tools — ordering platforms, product configurators, training portals — are available to distributors, and is adoption tracked?
Medium
7
Is there a structured recognition and loyalty programme for top-performing distributors?
Low
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Distributor Selection & Qualification
Commercial Agreement & Structure
Performance Management & Accountability
Development & Growth Support
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
14
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
EUROPE-AS-A-SERVICE (EAAS) AUDIT Strategy | Sales & Marketing
Assess readiness, performance, and scalability of a European market entry executed via the Europe-as-a-Service model. Covers market access, distribution setup, commercial performance, and operational support infrastructure.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Market Readiness & Entry Conditions

🎯
SCOPE
Product, regulatory, and commercial readiness for European market entry
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is the product or service fully compliant with EU regulatory and certification requirements for each target country?
High
CE marking, REACH, EMC Directive, and country-specific requirements must be confirmed before commercial activity. Regulatory non-compliance halts market entry.
DATA SOURCE Legal, Product management
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is the pricing structure viable for the European market after accounting for logistics, duties, currency, and distribution margin?
High
3
Is there a validated customer need in the target European segments, confirmed by customer conversations — not assumed?
High
4
Is the minimum product assortment for European launch defined, and is there a clear rationale for what is excluded?
Medium
5
Are warranty, return, and after-sales service processes defined for European operations before first sale?
High
6
What is the planned go-live timeline, and are regulatory, logistics, and commercial dependencies mapped and resourced?
High
7
Is there a defined fallback plan if the initial market entry approach does not achieve traction within 12 months?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Distribution & Channel Setup

🎯
SCOPE
Distributor selection, appointment, and channel structure for Europe
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is the target channel model — direct, distributor, dealer, or hybrid — defined and validated for each country?
High
Channel model decisions made at headquarters without country-level validation frequently fail. Each country has different channel norms.
DATA SOURCE Commercial strategy, Market research
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Have distributors been selected based on documented criteria including coverage, capability, and financial health?
High
3
Are distributor agreements signed with minimum purchase commitments and defined territory rights?
High
4
Is there a defined onboarding programme for European distributors that covers product, brand, and commercial standards?
High
5
What is the planned stock model — local warehousing, central hub, or cross-docking — and is lead time acceptable for the market?
Medium
6
Is there a process for monitoring distributor sell-through rates vs. sell-in, to detect stock accumulation?
High
7
Are all country-specific language, labelling, and packaging requirements confirmed for each market in scope?
High
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Local Presence & Operations

🎯
SCOPE
Local representation, operational infrastructure, and brand visibility
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a named local representative or market contact in each active European country?
High
Without a local point of contact, distributors and customers escalate to headquarters in the manufacturer's time zone and language. Response quality deteriorates.
DATA SOURCE Commercial structure, HR
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the response time for customer and distributor support queries, and is it within the committed SLA?
High
3
Is the company registered for VAT in each country where goods are sold, and is customs compliance managed?
High
4
Are European trade show and market development activities planned, resourced, and linked to commercial objectives?
Medium
5
What is the digital presence status in European markets — website localisation, SEO, and social media by country?
Medium
6
Is there a defined customer service escalation path for European end-users beyond the distributor?
Medium
7
Are import processes, customs broker relationships, and logistics documentation standardised and tested?
High
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Commercial Performance & Scaling

🎯
SCOPE
Revenue growth, channel productivity, and readiness to scale
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is revenue growth in Europe on track vs. the market entry plan, and what is the primary cause of any variance?
High
Variance analysis must separate volume, price, country mix, and channel mix effects. Each cause has a different corrective action.
DATA SOURCE Finance, CRM
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the sell-through rate per distributor, and which distributors are developing market vs. holding stock?
High
3
Which European countries or segments are exceeding expectations, and what can be learned and replicated?
High
4
What are the top 3 commercial barriers reported by distributors, and is there a structured plan to address them?
High
5
Is the gross margin on European sales within the target range after all channel costs, logistics, and currency effects?
High
6
Is the organisation staffed and operationally ready to scale to the next revenue tier without adding proportionate cost?
Medium
7
What is the 3-year revenue plan for Europe, and is it based on bottom-up distributor plans or top-down targets?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Market Readiness & Entry Conditions
Distribution & Channel Setup
Local Presence & Operations
Commercial Performance & Scaling
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
20
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS AUDIT Strategy | Sales & Marketing
Assess the health, performance, and governance of international partnership relationships. Identifies where partnerships are creating value, where they are stagnating, and where they carry unmanaged risk.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Partner Selection & Strategic Fit

🎯
SCOPE
Whether existing and prospective partners were and are the right strategic choice
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is the strategic rationale for each active partnership documented and still valid, or has it drifted since inception?
High
Partnerships formed for sound reasons often continue beyond their strategic rationale. Review fit annually against current strategy, not the original decision.
DATA SOURCE Strategy documents, Commercial review
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Does each partner bring a capability or market access that the company cannot efficiently develop internally?
High
3
Have reference checks — with other companies who work with the same partner — been conducted recently?
Medium
4
Is the partner's financial health monitored annually, including ability to invest in joint activities?
High
5
Does the partner's customer base and market presence actually match the access and coverage originally expected?
High
6
Are partnership terms reviewed at each contract renewal to ensure they reflect current market conditions?
Medium
7
Is there an active pipeline of potential new partnerships to replace those that are underperforming or exiting?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Agreement Structure & Governance

🎯
SCOPE
The legal, commercial, and governance framework of each partnership
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are all partnership agreements current, signed, and reviewed in the last 24 months?
High
Unsigned or expired agreements leave commercial relationships legally unprotected. Lapsed agreements are a legal and governance failure.
DATA SOURCE Contract register, Legal
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are the roles, responsibilities, and authority levels of each party clearly defined in the agreement?
High
3
Is there a defined joint governance structure — meetings, escalation, and decision authority — and is it functioning?
High
4
Are IP, data sharing, and confidentiality terms clearly defined and audited periodically?
High
5
Is there a defined exit process — trigger conditions, notice periods, and asset/customer transition — that both parties understand?
High
6
Are non-compete and non-solicitation clauses still relevant and enforced in each active agreement?
Medium
7
Are currency, payment terms, and dispute resolution mechanisms appropriate for the current operating environment?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Operational Integration & Execution

🎯
SCOPE
How well joint operations are executed and integrated day-to-day
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are joint delivery processes documented and followed consistently by both parties?
High
Undocumented joint processes rely on relationship and memory. When personnel change, execution quality deteriorates without documentation.
DATA SOURCE Process maps, Operations
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are communication protocols between the partner organisations defined, including escalation contacts?
Medium
3
Are performance data shared openly between partners, or are there information asymmetries that create mistrust?
High
4
Is there a defined process for handling customer complaints that cross partner boundaries?
High
5
Are joint teams aligned on priorities, or do internal company pressures regularly override partnership commitments?
Medium
6
Are product or service handover points between partners quality-checked, and by whom?
Medium
7
Is there a shared technology or data platform supporting joint operations, and is it performing to requirements?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Performance Measurement & Value Creation

🎯
SCOPE
Whether the partnership is delivering its intended commercial and strategic value
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is the financial contribution of each partnership tracked and reviewed annually vs. its cost and resource commitment?
High
Partnerships that are difficult to value are rarely exited even when they should be. Financial measurement creates objectivity.
DATA SOURCE Finance, Partnership review
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are partnership KPIs defined beyond revenue — including customer satisfaction, delivery performance, and market development?
High
3
What is the satisfaction level of both parties with the partnership, and is it formally measured?
High
4
Are there joint strategic planning sessions at least annually to align on priorities and market opportunities?
Medium
5
What value has the partnership delivered that could not have been achieved independently, and is that value still meaningful?
High
6
Are there unexploited opportunities within the partnership that both parties have agreed on but not yet acted on?
Medium
7
Is there a succession plan for key relationship owners on both sides of the partnership?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Partner Selection & Strategic Fit
Agreement Structure & Governance
Operational Integration & Execution
Performance Measurement & Value Creation
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
16
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
MARKET ENTRY AUDIT Strategy | Sales & Marketing
Assess the readiness, design quality, and execution progress of a market entry strategy. Covers research, regulatory fit, commercial model, and go-to-market execution across target markets.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Market Research & Demand Validation

🎯
SCOPE
Quality and depth of research underpinning the entry decision
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there primary customer research — direct interviews with target customers in the entry market — underpinning the entry decision?
High
Secondary market reports do not validate demand. Primary research with 10–20 target customer conversations is the minimum credible standard.
DATA SOURCE Market research records, Commercial team
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is the target customer segment defined at a specific level — by industry, size, geography, and buyer profile?
High
3
What is the total addressable market (TAM) estimate for the entry segment, and is it based on verifiable data sources?
High
4
What are the top 3 customer problems or needs that the entering product/service addresses better than current alternatives?
High
5
Is there analysis of customer switching costs — what must a customer give up to buy from you vs. the incumbent?
Medium
6
Are there early customer commitments — LOIs, pilots, or paid orders — that validate real demand before full entry investment?
High
7
Is competitive intelligence current, including pricing, channel, and proposition of top 3 competitors in target market?
High
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Regulatory & Compliance Readiness

🎯
SCOPE
Legal, regulatory, and compliance requirements in the target market
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a confirmed list of all mandatory certifications, standards, and approvals required for each product in each target country?
High
Certification requirements vary by product category, country, and end-use. A gap here delays market entry by 6–18 months in regulated sectors.
DATA SOURCE Legal, Product management
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the status of each required regulatory approval, with a confirmed timeline?
High
3
Are import duties, customs classification, and country-of-origin requirements confirmed for each product?
High
4
Is there a defined local legal entity or appointed fiscal representative for tax and legal compliance purposes?
High
5
Are data protection and GDPR requirements assessed for customer data collected in European target markets?
High
6
Are employment and agent law requirements understood for any local sales or representative appointments?
Medium
7
Is there a defined process for monitoring regulatory changes in target markets after entry?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Commercial Model & Pricing

🎯
SCOPE
Revenue model, pricing structure, and commercial viability
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is the revenue model — direct sales, distribution, licensing, or subscription — validated for the target market?
High
Revenue models from the home market are not always transferable. Validate the model with potential customers before committing to the infrastructure it requires.
DATA SOURCE Commercial strategy, Market research
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is the entry price point competitive in the target market after full cost build-up including logistics, duties, and channel costs?
High
3
Is the margin at target pricing sufficient to sustain the business after all channel, logistics, and support costs?
High
4
Is there a pricing policy that prevents grey market or inter-market arbitrage?
Medium
5
Is the payment terms structure for the target market confirmed — standard terms, credit risk, and currency?
Medium
6
Are there defined discounting authority levels and a minimum price floor for the target market?
Medium
7
Is there a 3-year financial model for the market entry with breakeven timeline and investment requirements?
High
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Go-To-Market Execution

🎯
SCOPE
Execution quality of the commercial launch and first-year market development
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a launch plan with named owners, milestones, and deadlines for the first 90 days in market?
High
A launch plan without named owners is a list of wishes. Each milestone needs one accountable person and a defined completion date.
DATA SOURCE Project management, Commercial team
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are the first 10 target customers identified by name, with an approach and timeline for each?
High
3
Is the sales team equipped with market-appropriate materials — language, format, references, and case studies?
High
4
What is the planned lead generation approach, and is the budget and resource committed?
High
5
What does successful market entry look like at 6, 12, and 24 months — in specific, measurable terms?
High
6
Is there a feedback loop from the field to commercial leadership that operates at weekly frequency in the first 90 days?
Medium
7
Is there a defined pivot or exit decision process if traction is not achieved by the 12-month milestone?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Market Research & Demand Validation
Regulatory & Compliance Readiness
Commercial Model & Pricing
Go-To-Market Execution
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
20
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
CHANGE LEADERSHIP AUDIT Leadership | HR/People
Assess the quality of leadership driving a significant change initiative. Covers vision clarity, coalition building, communication, and embedding. Poor change leadership is the leading cause of change programme failure.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Vision, Urgency & Case for Change

🎯
SCOPE
Whether the need for change is clearly communicated and genuinely believed
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Can every senior leader articulate the same case for change in their own words, without reference to a presentation?
High
Test this by asking 5 leaders separately. If answers diverge significantly, the case for change has not landed. Alignment requires rehearsal, not just communication.
DATA SOURCE Leadership interviews
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is the cost of not changing quantified and communicated, not just the benefit of changing?
High
3
Is there a specific and credible deadline or forcing event that creates urgency for the change?
High
4
Have leaders at all levels been given the same information about why the change is necessary?
High
5
Is the strategic narrative connecting the change to customer and business outcomes, or only to internal efficiency?
Medium
6
Has independent analysis of the change need been conducted, or is it driven entirely by internal management view?
Medium
7
Are middle managers equipped to explain and defend the change programme to their teams?
High
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Coalition Building & Leadership Alignment

🎯
SCOPE
The depth and genuineness of leadership alignment behind the change
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a guiding coalition — a group of senior leaders with both authority and credibility — actively driving the change?
High
Change driven by one leader is fragile. A coalition of credible voices from different parts of the organisation is more resilient.
DATA SOURCE Change governance, Leadership team
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are there visibly resistant senior leaders, and is that resistance being managed or ignored?
High
3
Are change champions identified and resourced at operational levels below the senior leadership team?
Medium
4
Is resistance being actively listened to and responded to, or dismissed as a people problem?
Medium
5
Are the personal interests of key influencers understood, and is the change framed in those terms?
High
6
Are board members and external stakeholders aligned with the direction and pace of change?
High
7
Is there a mechanism to surface anonymous concerns from the organisation about the change programme?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Communication & Engagement

🎯
SCOPE
Quality, frequency, and effectiveness of change communication
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a written change communication plan defining messages, channels, frequency, and target audiences?
High
Ad hoc change communication creates information vacuums that fill with rumour. A written plan with scheduled communication beats reactive messaging.
DATA SOURCE Change communication plan
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are communications two-way — including mechanisms for questions, concerns, and feedback — or only broadcast?
High
3
Is change communication adapted for different audiences — language, format, and level of detail?
Medium
4
How is the effectiveness of change communication being measured, not just the volume of communication?
High
5
Are employees given the opportunity to ask questions directly of change leadership, not just line managers?
Medium
6
Is there a consistent cadence of change updates, even when there is no major news to report?
Medium
7
Is the language of change communication clear and jargon-free for the entire target audience?
Low
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Embedding & Sustaining Change

🎯
SCOPE
How change is locked in and prevented from reverting
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are new behaviours being reinforced through performance management systems and individual accountability?
High
Change that is not linked to performance measurement and consequence is optional. New behaviours must be explicitly measured and rewarded.
DATA SOURCE HR process, Performance management
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Have systems, processes, and structures been redesigned to support new ways of working, or do old systems undermine the change?
High
3
Are early wins being identified, celebrated, and communicated to demonstrate that the change is working?
High
4
What happens to people who visibly revert to old behaviours after the change has been embedded?
High
5
Is the change programme formally closing milestones and transitioning accountability to line management?
Medium
6
Are new recruits being inducted into the changed organisation, not the old one?
Medium
7
Is there a post-implementation review mechanism to identify what has embedded and what remains at risk of reverting?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Vision, Urgency & Case for Change
Coalition Building & Leadership Alignment
Communication & Engagement
Embedding & Sustaining Change
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
16
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
DELEGATION AUDIT Leadership | HR/People
Assess the quality and effectiveness of delegation across management levels. Poor delegation creates leader bottlenecks, disempowered teams, and poor organisational development. Good delegation multiplies leadership capacity.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Delegation Scope & Clarity

🎯
SCOPE
Whether delegation is clear, documented, and consistently applied
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a documented decision rights matrix that defines who decides, who inputs, and who is informed for each key decision type?
High
Verbal delegation agreements are forgotten, disputed, and inconsistently applied. A written decision rights matrix removes ambiguity.
DATA SOURCE Decision rights document, HR
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Which decisions are currently being made at CEO or Director level that could be delegated one level down without material risk?
High
3
Are managers consistently delegating within the scope they have been given, or reverting to escalation for decisions within their authority?
High
4
Are there tasks and activities still performed by senior leaders that were intended to be delegated to their teams?
Medium
5
Is delegation of a task always accompanied by a clear outcome definition, timeline, and success criteria?
High
6
Are managers held accountable for decisions made within their delegated authority, including when outcomes are negative?
High
7
Is there clarity on the distinction between delegation (transfer of authority) and assignment (task handover without authority)?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Accountability Structures & Governance

🎯
SCOPE
How accountability is maintained after delegation
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a regular check-in cadence between delegators and delegatees that reviews outcomes, not activity?
High
Check-ins focused on activity are micromanagement in disguise. Focus on outcomes and remove obstacles, not monitor steps.
DATA SOURCE Management meetings, Process
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What happens when a delegated task fails — is the cause reviewed to improve future delegation or is the delegation withdrawn?
High
3
Are individuals who have been delegated authority given the information access they need to make good decisions?
High
4
Is there a reporting mechanism that allows the delegator to maintain awareness without micromanaging?
Medium
5
Are team members aware of the boundaries of their delegated authority, and do they test those limits regularly?
Medium
6
Is there a process for team members to escalate decisions that fall outside their authority, with a committed response time?
High
7
Are delegation levels formally reviewed when team members are promoted or when organisational structures change?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Capability Building & Confidence

🎯
SCOPE
Whether teams are capable and confident enough to accept and execute delegation
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are the capability requirements for each delegated responsibility formally identified and matched to the individual?
High
Delegating above current capability without development support sets people up to fail. Match task complexity to assessed readiness.
DATA SOURCE HR, Competency framework
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are employees who have been delegated new responsibilities given adequate coaching, not just instruction?
High
3
Is there a formal mechanism for people to request support when they encounter delegation challenges beyond their current experience?
Medium
4
Are team members who perform well with delegated authority given progressively greater scope?
Medium
5
Is fear of failure — or a history of punitive responses to failure — preventing acceptance of delegated responsibility?
High
6
Are managers trained in how to delegate effectively — including how to brief, check in, and release control?
Medium
7
Is the delegation culture assessed in employee engagement surveys, and do results drive management development actions?
Low
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Time Liberation & Leadership Focus

🎯
SCOPE
Whether effective delegation frees senior leadership for higher-value activities
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What percentage of the CEO's and senior leaders' time is currently spent on tasks that could be delegated?
High
Senior leaders who spend more than 30% of their time on operationally delegable tasks are limiting both their own contribution and their team's development.
DATA SOURCE Time audit, Leadership interviews
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What are the highest-leverage activities that senior leaders should be doing but are currently displaced by delegable tasks?
High
3
Have leaders identified and communicated their own delegation development goals to their teams?
Medium
4
Is there a delegation audit conducted at least annually to review what has been retained at each level that should move down?
Medium
5
Are there structural features — such as sole approval requirements in systems — that prevent effective delegation even when intent exists?
Medium
6
Is the time saved by effective delegation visibly reinvested in strategic activities, not absorbed by more operational work?
High
7
What is the ratio of decisions made by leaders within vs. above their expected authority level, and is it tracked?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Delegation Scope & Clarity
Accountability Structures & Governance
Capability Building & Confidence
Time Liberation & Leadership Focus
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
15
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
DIFFICULT CONVERSATIONS AUDIT Leadership | HR/People
Assess how well the organisation conducts difficult but necessary conversations — on performance, conflict, behaviour, and change. Avoidance of difficult conversations is one of the highest-cost leadership failures.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Conversation Readiness & Preparation

🎯
SCOPE
How managers prepare for difficult conversations before they happen
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are managers trained in a specific framework for preparing and conducting difficult conversations?
High
Without a framework, managers either avoid the conversation, over-engineer it, or handle it inconsistently. Training in a specific model improves consistency and outcome.
DATA SOURCE HR training records, Manager survey
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is the purpose of the conversation — feedback, problem-solving, or decision — clarified before the conversation begins?
High
3
Are managers coached to separate the observable behaviour or fact from their interpretation before the conversation?
High
4
Is there a protocol for ensuring that both parties have adequate time and privacy for sensitive conversations?
Medium
5
Do managers document key facts and examples before a difficult performance or behaviour conversation?
High
6
Is HR or a trained mediator involved in conversations above a defined complexity or risk threshold?
High
7
Are there patterns of conversation avoidance identifiable in specific teams or managers, and is the cause diagnosed?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Conversation Conduct & Communication

🎯
SCOPE
How difficult conversations are actually conducted
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Do managers open difficult conversations with the specific issue, not with positive framing that dilutes the message?
High
The 'feedback sandwich' is well-intentioned but often causes the key message to be missed. Important messages should be stated directly and clearly.
DATA SOURCE HR training, Manager interviews
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is listening quality maintained during difficult conversations, or does the manager spend most of the time talking?
High
3
Are emotions acknowledged during difficult conversations without being used to control the discussion?
Medium
4
Is the conversation focused on specific, changeable behaviour — not personality, character, or general attitude?
High
5
Is there a clear, mutual understanding of what will change and by when, before the conversation ends?
High
6
Are open questions used to understand the other person's perspective before judgements are communicated?
Medium
7
Is the tone of difficult conversations respectful regardless of the seriousness of the issue?
High
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Emotional Regulation & Conflict Management

🎯
SCOPE
Managing emotional intensity and interpersonal conflict
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are managers trained to recognise when a conversation has reached a level of emotional intensity that requires a pause?
High
Continuing a conversation past the point of productive engagement is counterproductive. The ability to pause and resume is a key skill.
DATA SOURCE HR training, Manager survey
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is there a defined protocol for managing situations where a difficult conversation becomes a conflict?
High
3
Do leaders model emotional regulation in difficult conversations — especially with their own managers?
High
4
Is there a structured mediation process for interpersonal conflicts between peers or across departments?
Medium
5
Are managers aware of their personal triggers in difficult conversations, and do they have strategies to manage them?
Medium
6
Is there a defined process for following up after a difficult conversation to confirm the outcome has been heard and understood?
Medium
7
Are outcomes of significant difficult conversations documented in writing with the other party's acknowledgement?
High
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Culture, Follow-Through & Systemic Patterns

🎯
SCOPE
Whether the organisation is structurally set up to have honest conversations
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there evidence that difficult performance conversations result in improved performance or appropriate exits — not just documentation?
High
Difficult conversations that result in no change either confirm that the conversation was too soft or that accountability is absent.
DATA SOURCE HR data, Performance records
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is the culture one where feedback — including upward feedback to senior leaders — is genuinely welcomed?
High
3
What is the grievance and complaint rate, and does it correlate with specific managers or teams?
High
4
Are there topics that are systematically avoided in the organisation — and do leaders know what they are?
High
5
Is the time between an identified performance problem and the first formal conversation within acceptable limits?
High
6
Are leaders who consistently avoid necessary conversations identified and developed or managed?
Medium
7
Is there a confidential employee feedback mechanism that captures whether difficult conversations are happening at the right time and quality?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Conversation Readiness & Preparation
Conversation Conduct & Communication
Emotional Regulation & Conflict Management
Culture, Follow-Through & Systemic Patterns
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
19
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
MEETING EFFECTIVENESS AUDIT Operational | Leadership
Assess the quality, efficiency, and output of meetings across the organisation. Ineffective meetings are one of the most significant and most ignored drains on organisational productivity.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Meeting Design & Purpose

🎯
SCOPE
Whether meetings are designed to achieve their intended purpose
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What percentage of recurring meetings have a written agenda circulated in advance of at least 24 hours?
High
Meetings without agendas are conversations with no defined destination. Agenda requirement is the minimum standard for productive meeting culture.
DATA SOURCE Calendar audit, Meeting policy
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are the stated objectives of each meeting type — information sharing, decision-making, or problem-solving — defined and appropriate to that format?
High
3
Is the attendance list for each meeting reviewed against actual decision-making need, or does it expand by default?
High
4
What is the average meeting duration vs. actual working time within the meeting?
Medium
5
Are pre-read materials sent before meetings that require input, and is reading completed before the meeting?
Medium
6
Are decision-making meetings structured with a clear decision record, alternatives considered, and decision owner?
High
7
Is meeting scheduling authority defined — who can call what type of meeting with whom — or is anyone free to schedule anyone's time?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Facilitation & Participation Quality

🎯
SCOPE
How effectively meetings are run and how participants engage
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is a facilitator or chair defined for each meeting, and are they trained or experienced in facilitation?
High
Meetings without a named facilitator run long, drift off-topic, and fail to reach closure on decisions. Facilitation is a skill, not a default responsibility.
DATA SOURCE Meeting policy, HR
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is participation balanced, or do certain voices consistently dominate while others are silent?
High
3
Are meeting participants visibly present — not on phones or laptops for non-meeting work — during discussions?
Medium
4
Are dissenting views actively invited before key decisions are made?
High
5
Is the start and end time of meetings respected consistently across the organisation?
Medium
6
Are virtual or hybrid participants given equal standing in meetings, or do they become passive observers?
Medium
7
Is there a mechanism for participants to provide feedback on meeting effectiveness after high-stakes or recurring meetings?
Low
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Decision & Action Management

🎯
SCOPE
Whether meetings produce clear decisions and followed-through actions
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are meeting decisions documented with the decision made, owner, and date, before the meeting ends?
High
Decisions that are not recorded before the meeting ends are subject to differing interpretation. In-meeting documentation is the only reliable standard.
DATA SOURCE Meeting minutes, Management process
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are action items documented with a single owner and specific completion date — not a team or 'by next meeting'?
High
3
What percentage of actions from the previous meeting are reviewed and completed at the start of the next meeting?
High
4
Are meeting minutes or notes distributed within 24 hours of the meeting?
Medium
5
Is there a distinction between decisions made in the meeting and decisions that require post-meeting ratification or sign-off?
High
6
Are recurring meetings required to report their output (decisions, actions, risks) to a meeting above them in the governance hierarchy?
Medium
7
Is there a periodic review of all recurring meetings to confirm that each one is still necessary and effective?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Meeting Culture & Organisational Habits

🎯
SCOPE
The cultural norms and habits around meetings across the organisation
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the average percentage of working hours spent in meetings per level of the organisation, and is it within an acceptable range?
High
Front-line staff in more than 15% meetings: a symptom. Senior leaders in more than 50%: a crisis. Measure by level before setting targets.
DATA SOURCE Calendar data, HR
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are there protected deep-work hours — meeting-free blocks — formally established in the organisation?
High
3
Do senior leaders model good meeting behaviour — arriving on time, pre-reading, staying on agenda, ending on time?
High
4
Is there explicit leadership permission to decline meetings where the individual's presence is not necessary?
Medium
5
Are meetings used as the primary decision-making forum, or are some decisions made asynchronously?
Medium
6
What is the culture around meeting cancellation and rescheduling — is it accepted or penalised?
Low
7
Is there a defined meeting policy — covering types, sizes, frequencies, and governance — and is it actively enforced?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Meeting Design & Purpose
Facilitation & Participation Quality
Decision & Action Management
Meeting Culture & Organisational Habits
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
14
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
TEAM MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP AUDIT Leadership | HR/People
Assess the quality of team management and leadership behaviours across the organisation. Identifies where teams are under-managed, poorly directed, or disengaged — and what specific leadership gaps are driving the issues.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Team Structure, Roles & Direction

🎯
SCOPE
Whether teams are correctly structured and clearly directed
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Does every team member have a role profile that defines their specific responsibilities, decision rights, and performance expectations?
High
Teams where responsibilities overlap or have gaps between them are structurally set up for conflict and underperformance.
DATA SOURCE HR, Role profiles
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is the team size within the manageable span of control for the type of work and the manager's experience?
Medium
3
Is the team's mission — what it exists to produce — documented and understood by every team member?
High
4
Are team priorities aligned with organisational priorities, or are teams working on internally generated objectives not connected to strategy?
High
5
Is there a defined cadence of team meetings, one-to-one check-ins, and performance conversations?
High
6
Are cross-team dependencies understood and managed, or do they regularly create delays and disputes?
Medium
7
Is team composition reviewed annually to assess whether the current skills mix matches the team's evolving objectives?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Performance Management

🎯
SCOPE
How individual and team performance is set, monitored, and managed
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are individual performance objectives set at the start of each review period, are they specific, and are they aligned to team objectives?
High
Objectives that are not specific and not aligned to team goals create effort that doesn't compound. SMART goals aligned to team mission are the minimum standard.
DATA SOURCE HR, Performance records
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the distribution of performance ratings, and does it differentiate high from average from low performers?
High
3
Are underperformance situations identified early and managed with a defined performance improvement process?
High
4
Do high performers receive differentiated recognition, development opportunities, and compensation relative to average performers?
High
5
Are managers held accountable for the performance of their team as a whole, not just their individual contribution?
High
6
Is there a process to identify and manage persistent low performers — with a defined timeline and consequence?
Medium
7
Are performance conversations conducted regularly throughout the year, or only at the annual review?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Development, Motivation & Engagement

🎯
SCOPE
Whether teams are growing, engaged, and retained
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Does every team member have an active personal development plan agreed with their manager?
High
Development plans that exist only in the HR system but are not actively discussed or invested in are administrative theatre.
DATA SOURCE HR, Development records
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the voluntary turnover rate by team, and is it correlated with specific managers?
High
3
Are team members able to articulate their career development path within the organisation?
High
4
What is the employee engagement score by team, and is there a defined action plan where engagement is below average?
High
5
Are development investments targeted to high-impact skills gaps and future roles, not only current role maintenance?
Medium
6
Do managers actively create development opportunities — stretch assignments, cross-functional projects, external exposure — not just send people on courses?
Medium
7
Is there a formal talent review process that identifies high-potential individuals across the organisation?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Team Dynamics, Trust & Psychological Safety

🎯
SCOPE
The quality of relationships and safety within and between teams
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are team members willing to raise problems and mistakes openly, or do problems tend to be concealed until they escalate?
High
Concealed problems are the highest-cost form of team dysfunction. Psychological safety — permission to speak without fear — is the enabling condition.
DATA SOURCE Employee survey, Incident data
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are inter-team conflicts identified early and resolved with management facilitation, or allowed to fester?
High
3
Is there evidence that team members constructively challenge each other's views, or is harmony prioritised over honesty?
High
4
Does the team manager create equal voice and opportunity for all team members, regardless of personality type?
Medium
5
Are there sub-group dynamics or cliques that undermine team coherence?
Medium
6
Is there a team working agreement — defining how the team communicates, makes decisions, and resolves conflict — that all members know and follow?
Medium
7
Is the physical or virtual working environment structured to enable effective team collaboration?
Low
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Team Structure, Roles & Direction
Performance Management
Development, Motivation & Engagement
Team Dynamics, Trust & Psychological Safety
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
16
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
LEAN BASICS AUDIT Operational
Assess the maturity of lean thinking and practices across operations. Identifies waste, flow problems, and improvement capability. Lean is not a toolkit — it is a management discipline that requires daily practice.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Value Stream Understanding

🎯
SCOPE
How well the organisation understands its value streams and customer-defined value
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a current-state value stream map for each major product or service family?
High
Value stream maps that are more than 12 months old in a dynamic environment are historical documents, not management tools. Require currency.
DATA SOURCE Process maps, Operations team
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is customer-defined value explicitly documented — what the customer pays for vs. what you assume they want?
High
3
What percentage of total process cycle time is value-adding time vs. waiting and transport time?
High
4
Are all handover steps between process stages mapped with the associated wait time and information requirements?
Medium
5
Is takt time calculated for each production process and used to set pace and resource targets?
High
6
Are bottleneck processes identified and their impact on total throughput quantified?
High
7
Is there a future-state value stream map, and is there a plan to implement it within a defined timeframe?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Waste Identification & Elimination

🎯
SCOPE
How systematically the 8 wastes are identified and reduced
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are team leaders and operators trained to identify and categorise the 8 wastes in their own work area?
High
Waste identification requires training. Without shared vocabulary and classification, waste is noticed but not categorised or acted on.
DATA SOURCE Training records, Operator survey
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the most significant waste category in the current operation, and what is the annual cost?
High
3
Is there a formal mechanism for operators to report and escalate waste observations?
High
4
Are waste elimination projects tracked with before/after measurements and confirmed savings?
High
5
Is motion waste — unnecessary movement of people or materials — analysed using spaghetti diagrams or equivalent?
Medium
6
Is over-processing waste — doing more than the customer requires — identified in production and design?
Medium
7
Is the cost of defects and rework tracked as a specific line item and presented to management monthly?
High
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Flow, Pull & Scheduling

🎯
SCOPE
How material and information flow through the process
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is production organised around continuous flow where possible, or does it rely on batch-and-queue scheduling?
High
Batch production in environments where single-piece flow is feasible creates excess WIP, lead time, and quality risk. Assess feasibility.
DATA SOURCE Production process, Operations
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are pull systems — kanban or equivalent — in place to regulate flow between process stages?
High
3
What is the WIP level at each process stage vs. the target level, and how is variance managed?
High
4
Is production scheduling based on customer demand signals, or on forecast and batch economic logic?
Medium
5
How are equipment changeovers managed, and what is the current changeover time vs. target?
Medium
6
Is there a daily production planning meeting with visible performance vs. plan?
High
7
Are scheduling problems caused by upstream supply variability vs. internal process variability clearly distinguished?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Continuous Improvement Culture

🎯
SCOPE
Whether lean improvement is embedded as a daily habit
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a documented daily management system — tiered meetings, visual management, and problem-solving — that functions every working day?
High
Lean improvement without a daily management system produces projects, not culture. The daily rhythm is what sustains lean over the medium term.
DATA SOURCE Operations process, Manager interviews
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the number of improvement ideas submitted per employee per year, and how many are implemented?
High
3
Are team leaders empowered to implement small improvements within their work area without higher approval?
High
4
Is kaizen event activity tracked — frequency, scope, and confirmed results — by work area?
Medium
5
Are lean competencies included in job profiles and performance objectives for operational management roles?
Medium
6
Is there a defined lean maturity model, and does the organisation know where it sits on that scale?
Medium
7
Are suppliers engaged in lean improvement activities — especially those supplying high-volume or quality-critical components?
Low
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Value Stream Understanding
Waste Identification & Elimination
Flow, Pull & Scheduling
Continuous Improvement Culture
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
17
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
MAINTENANCE AUDIT Operational
Assess the effectiveness of maintenance planning, execution, and equipment reliability management. Poor maintenance management is a direct cost driver and an indirect cause of quality failure and delivery unreliability.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Maintenance Planning & Scheduling

🎯
SCOPE
How preventive and corrective maintenance is planned and scheduled
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the ratio of planned preventive maintenance to unplanned reactive maintenance, and is it improving over time?
High
Best practice targets 80%+ planned maintenance. High reactive maintenance ratios indicate planning immaturity and are more expensive per event.
DATA SOURCE Maintenance records, CMMS
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is there a formal preventive maintenance schedule for all critical equipment, based on manufacturer recommendations and operational experience?
High
3
Are maintenance activities prioritised by equipment criticality — impact on safety, production, and quality?
High
4
What is the average maintenance backlog, and is it within manageable limits relative to planned capacity?
High
5
Are maintenance windows coordinated with production planning to minimise production downtime?
Medium
6
Is there a defined emergency maintenance response protocol, including call-out responsibilities and escalation?
Medium
7
Are maintenance KPIs — MTBF, MTTR, OEE — tracked and reviewed monthly at management level?
High
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Equipment Condition & Reliability

🎯
SCOPE
The current state and reliability of production and critical infrastructure assets
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a current asset register with condition assessment for each piece of equipment?
High
Asset registers without condition data do not support investment prioritisation or risk assessment. Condition must be formally assessed.
DATA SOURCE Asset register, Maintenance records
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) for critical production assets, and how does it compare to the previous 12 months?
High
3
Which equipment items have the highest frequency of unplanned failure, and what are the root causes?
High
4
Are critical spare parts held for high-impact equipment, and is availability confirmed before a failure occurs?
High
5
Is condition-based monitoring — vibration, temperature, oil analysis — used on critical rotating equipment?
Medium
6
What is the average age of production-critical equipment relative to expected service life?
Medium
7
Is there a documented planned replacement schedule for equipment approaching end-of-life?
High
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Spare Parts & Inventory Management

🎯
SCOPE
Effectiveness of spare parts management and availability
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a controlled spare parts inventory linked to the asset register, with defined minimum stock levels per item?
High
Spare parts managed without reference to specific equipment creates both gaps in critical spares and excess stock of unnecessary parts.
DATA SOURCE CMMS, Inventory system
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the value of slow-moving or obsolete spare parts in inventory, and how is this managed?
Medium
3
Are critical spare parts sourced from single suppliers, and what is the contingency plan for supply disruption?
High
4
What is the average procurement lead time for critical spare parts, and does it match the maintenance urgency requirements?
High
5
Is there a process for capturing actual spare parts usage and feeding it back into inventory planning?
Medium
6
Are spare parts managed under a controlled storage and issue process, or are they informally accessed?
Medium
7
Is there a standardisation programme to reduce the number of unique spare parts by specifying common components across equipment?
Low
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Maintenance Documentation & Team Competency

🎯
SCOPE
The quality of maintenance records, procedures, and team skills
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are standard maintenance procedures documented, current, and accessible in the work area for all planned maintenance tasks?
High
Maintenance executed from memory or individual experience is inconsistent and creates knowledge concentration risk.
DATA SOURCE CMMS, Maintenance procedures
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is all maintenance activity — planned, unplanned, and inspection — recorded in the CMMS with cause, action, and outcome?
High
3
Are maintenance team competencies formally assessed against the equipment and process complexity they maintain?
High
4
What is the training and certification status of maintenance staff for all equipment and safety requirements?
High
5
Is there a knowledge management process to capture and transfer equipment-specific knowledge from experienced technicians?
High
6
Are root cause analysis (RCA) investigations conducted for all significant equipment failures, with corrective actions tracked?
High
7
Is the maintenance team staffed at sufficient levels, including contingency capacity for peak demand and absence?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Maintenance Planning & Scheduling
Equipment Condition & Reliability
Spare Parts & Inventory Management
Maintenance Documentation & Team Competency
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
19
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
PROCESS IMPROVEMENT AUDIT Operational
Assess the maturity and effectiveness of process improvement capability across the organisation. Covers diagnostic skills, improvement methodology, implementation quality, and the structures needed to sustain improvement over time.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Process Mapping & Baseline Measurement

🎯
SCOPE
The quality of process documentation and performance baselines
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are current-state process maps available for all key operational processes, and when were they last validated?
High
Process maps that have not been walked and validated in the last 12 months may no longer reflect the actual process. Currency is critical.
DATA SOURCE Process maps, Operations team
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are process performance baselines — cycle time, error rate, throughput, cost — documented before improvement work begins?
High
3
Is there a systematic approach to identifying which processes are candidates for improvement, based on data rather than perception?
High
4
Are the voices of customers and front-line staff incorporated into the process mapping and baseline activities?
Medium
5
Is there a defined scope boundary for each improvement project that prevents scope creep?
Medium
6
Are process maps updated immediately when processes are changed, or do maps lag behind reality?
High
7
What is the gap between documented process and actual observed process for key operational workflows?
High
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Root Cause Analysis & Problem Definition

🎯
SCOPE
The quality of problem diagnosis before solutions are implemented
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a defined root cause analysis methodology — 5 Why, Fishbone, Fault Tree — used consistently across improvement projects?
High
Teams that use different RCA methods produce inconsistent analysis quality. Consistency enables comparison, training, and quality review.
DATA SOURCE Training records, Improvement process
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are improvement projects prohibited from implementing solutions before a documented root cause is confirmed?
High
3
Are root cause analyses reviewed by a second person before solution design begins?
Medium
4
Is the difference between the symptom and the root cause explicitly documented in each improvement project?
High
5
Are data collection and analysis methods validated before being used to diagnose process problems?
High
6
Is there a process to validate that the identified root cause is actually the cause, rather than a correlation?
Medium
7
Are patterns identified across multiple improvement projects — shared root causes across different processes?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Improvement Design, Testing & Validation

🎯
SCOPE
How improvements are designed, tested, and validated before full implementation
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are improvement solutions designed as controlled experiments — with a hypothesis, test plan, and success criteria — before full implementation?
High
Full implementation of untested solutions is the primary cause of improvement project failures that require re-work or reversal.
DATA SOURCE Project governance, Improvement process
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are pilot tests conducted at a limited scale before organisation-wide implementation?
High
3
Is improvement design conducted with the involvement of the people who perform the process?
High
4
Are the risks and unintended consequences of each proposed improvement explicitly assessed before implementation?
Medium
5
Is there a defined success threshold — not just direction of improvement — that must be met for the improvement to be considered validated?
High
6
Are comparison periods (before and after) of sufficient length to confirm that observed improvements are real and not statistical noise?
Medium
7
Is there a formal handover from the improvement team to the process owner when the improvement has been validated?
High
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Implementation & Sustainability

🎯
SCOPE
Whether improvements are implemented effectively and sustained over time
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are process improvements documented in updated SOPs, training materials, and job aids before going live?
High
Implementing improvements without updating documentation creates a system that reverts to the old process as soon as trained staff turn over.
DATA SOURCE Document control, SOP library
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What percentage of improvement projects still show sustained results at 12 months post-implementation?
High
3
Is there a formal 30/60/90-day post-implementation review for each improvement project?
High
4
Are improvement project results reported to senior management with financial quantification?
High
5
Is there a mechanism for the organisation to capture and reuse improvement learnings across different teams and sites?
Medium
6
Is there an improvement programme backlog — prioritised and resourced — to ensure continuous work on the highest-impact improvements?
Medium
7
Are process owners trained in how to maintain the improved process and respond to drift?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Process Mapping & Baseline Measurement
Root Cause Analysis & Problem Definition
Improvement Design, Testing & Validation
Implementation & Sustainability
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
18
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
QUALITY AUDIT Operational
Assess the maturity and effectiveness of quality management across product, process, and supply chain. Identifies where quality risk is highest and where quality cost can be reduced through prevention rather than inspection.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Quality Standards & System Compliance

🎯
SCOPE
Regulatory, certification, and customer-mandated quality requirements
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are all applicable quality management certifications (ISO 9001, IATF, sector-specific) current and surveillance audits completed on schedule?
High
Lapsed certifications create customer and regulatory risk and are frequently not discovered until a customer qualification audit.
DATA SOURCE Certification records, Quality management system
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are internal quality audits conducted at the defined frequency, and do findings drive documented corrective actions?
High
3
What is the current non-conformance rate vs. customer requirements, and is it trending up or down?
High
4
Are customer-specific quality requirements documented and formally communicated to all relevant production and quality personnel?
High
5
Is there a formal management of change process that assesses quality impact before process, product, or supplier changes are implemented?
High
6
Are quality objectives defined at company and departmental level and reviewed at management review meetings?
Medium
7
Is the cost of quality — prevention, appraisal, internal failure, external failure — tracked and reported annually?
High
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Inspection, Testing & Non-Conformance Management

🎯
SCOPE
The effectiveness of detection and containment systems
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is incoming material inspected against defined acceptance criteria, and is the inspection rate risk-based?
High
100% inspection of all incoming materials is expensive and unnecessary. Risk-based incoming inspection focusses resource on high-impact, high-variation suppliers.
DATA SOURCE Inspection records, Supplier data
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the in-process defect rate, and at which stage of production do defects originate?
High
3
Is there a documented process for containing and segregating non-conforming product to prevent inadvertent shipment?
High
4
What is the average time from defect identification to root cause completion and corrective action implementation?
High
5
Is first-pass yield tracked at each production stage, and are yield loss reasons coded and categorised?
High
6
Are inspection and test equipment calibrated on schedule, and are calibration records maintained?
High
7
Is there a defined process for customer complaint classification, root cause analysis, and formal response within committed timescales?
High
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Supplier Quality Management

🎯
SCOPE
Quality assurance and development across the supply chain
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are suppliers formally approved against defined quality criteria before being authorised to supply?
High
Unapproved suppliers in the supply chain create uncontrolled quality risk. Approval must precede first order, not follow first failure.
DATA SOURCE Supplier quality system, Procurement
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is incoming material non-conformance tracked per supplier, and do patterns trigger formal supplier quality reviews?
High
3
Are quality requirements communicated to suppliers in the form of specifications, not assumptions?
High
4
Do suppliers have quality management systems of a standard appropriate to the products they supply?
High
5
Are supplier audits conducted at a frequency commensurate with the criticality and historical performance of each supplier?
Medium
6
Is there a formal supplier performance review process that covers quality, delivery, and responsiveness?
High
7
What is the process for developing supplier quality capability in underperforming but strategically important suppliers?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Quality Culture & Prevention

🎯
SCOPE
Whether quality is owned by the organisation or delegated to the quality department
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are quality objectives included in individual performance targets for operational and management roles outside the quality function?
High
Quality managed only by the quality department is a departmental function, not an organisational value. Line ownership is what creates culture.
DATA SOURCE HR, Performance management
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the ratio of quality investment in prevention vs. appraisal and failure correction?
High
3
Do team leaders have the authority to stop production when a quality concern is identified, without escalation?
High
4
Are quality improvements celebrated and communicated across the organisation with the same prominence as production achievements?
Medium
5
Is quality performance shared with and discussed by front-line production teams, not only management?
High
6
Is there a formal mechanism for production staff to report quality concerns or risks before they become defects?
High
7
Are lessons learned from quality failures shared across the organisation and incorporated into training and SOPs?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Quality Standards & System Compliance
Inspection, Testing & Non-Conformance Management
Supplier Quality Management
Quality Culture & Prevention
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
23
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
WASTE REDUCTION AUDIT Operational | Financial
Assess and quantify sources of physical, process, and resource waste across the business. Identifies both environmental and financial waste reduction opportunities. Goes beyond lean manufacturing to include energy, procurement, and administrative waste.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Material & Inventory Waste

🎯
SCOPE
Waste from materials, packaging, and inventory management
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the total material waste volume and cost per year, by waste category and production stage?
High
Material waste quantified only at a total level cannot be targeted. Category and stage breakdown determines where investment in waste reduction will yield the highest return.
DATA SOURCE Production data, Finance
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the ratio of waste to total material consumed, and how does it compare to industry benchmark?
High
3
Are scrap and offcut materials separated, characterised, and directed to the highest-value recovery route?
Medium
4
What is the annual cost of packaging waste, and have lightweighting or elimination opportunities been assessed?
Medium
5
What is the value of inventory written off for obsolescence or damage annually, and what is the root cause?
High
6
Is raw material receipt inspection catching supplier-caused waste before it enters the production process?
High
7
Are material usage standards documented, and is actual usage tracked against standard per product?
High
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Process & Time Waste

🎯
SCOPE
Waste embedded in operational processes and management activities
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the total time cost of rework across all production processes, and at which stages is it concentrated?
High
Rework time quantified in cost per year creates the business case for investment in defect prevention. Most organisations underestimate it significantly.
DATA SOURCE Quality records, Production data
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the time lost to waiting — for materials, approvals, information, or equipment — per FTE per week?
High
3
Are there process steps that exist for historical rather than current reasons, and that add no measurable value?
Medium
4
What is the administrative time consumed by compliance and reporting activities vs. the decisions they inform?
Medium
5
Is meeting time included in total waste analysis, and has it been quantified as a cost?
Medium
6
Are there IT system activities — manual data entry, re-keying between systems, or workarounds — that generate time waste measurable in hours per week?
High
7
Is the cost of poor scheduling — idle time, overtime, and last-minute changeovers — tracked and attributed to a specific management failure?
High
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Energy & Utilities

🎯
SCOPE
Energy and utility consumption, efficiency, and cost
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is energy consumption tracked by production unit, process, and facility, or only at the site meter level?
High
Site-level energy tracking cannot identify which processes are energy inefficient. Sub-metering by production area is the minimum requirement for improvement.
DATA SOURCE Utility bills, Energy monitoring
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is energy cost as a percentage of total production cost, and how has it trended over 3 years?
High
3
What is the energy consumed per unit of output (energy intensity), and has it improved or worsened over 3 years?
High
4
Are energy waste sources — compressed air leaks, idle equipment, lighting in unused areas — systematically identified and addressed?
Medium
5
Is energy and water consumption monitored in real time, with alerts for anomalous consumption?
Medium
6
What is the investment horizon and return calculation for the most energy-intensive equipment replacement or upgrade?
Medium
7
Are renewable energy options assessed for each facility, and is there a renewable energy procurement plan?
Low
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Waste Governance & Reporting

🎯
SCOPE
Structures and accountability for waste management
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is waste — material, time, and energy — reported as a financial metric in the management information pack?
High
Waste visible in management reports is managed. Waste absent from reports is tolerated by default.
DATA SOURCE Management reports, Finance
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is there a waste reduction target, and is progress against it reviewed in monthly management meetings?
High
3
Are there defined waste reduction owners for each major waste category?
High
4
Is waste reduction included in the annual budget and investment planning process?
Medium
5
Are waste data collection and reporting methods audited for accuracy?
Medium
6
Are regulatory waste reporting requirements (hazardous waste, emissions) fully met and documented?
High
7
Is there a formal waste hierarchy — reduce, reuse, recover, dispose — applied to all waste management decisions?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Material & Inventory Waste
Process & Time Waste
Energy & Utilities
Waste Governance & Reporting
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
16
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
SOP LIBRARY AUDIT Operational
Assess the completeness, quality, accessibility, and compliance of the Standard Operating Procedure library. An SOP library that is incomplete, outdated, or unused is a quality and operational risk, not an asset.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

SOP Coverage & Completeness

🎯
SCOPE
Whether all critical processes are covered by current SOPs
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a process inventory that maps every key operational process to a corresponding SOP or confirms that no SOP is required?
High
An undocumented assumption that all key processes have SOPs creates gaps. The inventory provides the evidence.
DATA SOURCE Process inventory, SOP library
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What percentage of safety-critical and quality-critical processes are covered by current SOPs?
High
3
Are processes that involve regulatory compliance covered by SOPs that reflect current regulatory requirements?
High
4
Are SOPs available for all processes performed by temporary or contract staff?
High
5
Are there processes documented only in the minds of specific individuals, creating knowledge concentration risk?
High
6
Is SOP coverage reviewed and updated when new products, processes, or technologies are introduced?
High
7
Is there a formal SOP gap analysis conducted at least annually?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

SOP Quality & Usability

🎯
SCOPE
Whether SOPs are written to a standard that enables consistent execution
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are SOPs written at the reading level and format appropriate to the user performing the task?
High
SOPs written for auditors rather than operators are not used by operators. Test by observing whether staff refer to the SOP when performing the task.
DATA SOURCE SOP library, Observation
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Do SOPs include visual aids — photographs, diagrams, or video links — for tasks where visual reference improves accuracy?
High
3
Are critical decision points and quality checks explicitly identified in each SOP?
High
4
Are safety requirements — PPE, machine guarding, COSHH — integrated into the task SOPs rather than referenced as separate documents?
High
5
Do SOPs define the inputs, outputs, tools, and quality criteria for the task, not only the steps?
Medium
6
Is SOP complexity calibrated to the actual complexity of the task — detailed for complex tasks, simple for simple tasks?
Medium
7
Are SOPs tested by having a person unfamiliar with the task attempt to perform it using only the SOP as guidance?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Accessibility, Version Control & Maintenance

🎯
SCOPE
How SOPs are stored, accessed, updated, and controlled
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a document management system that provides version-controlled, single-source-of-truth storage for all SOPs?
High
Multiple versions of the same SOP in different locations is a quality disaster. One authoritative source with version control is a minimum standard.
DATA SOURCE Document management system, IT
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are current SOPs accessible at the point of use — in the work area, on a device, or on a screen — without requiring access to a central office?
High
3
Is there a defined SOP review cycle for each document, and is it tracked and enforced?
High
4
Is the approval and release process for new or revised SOPs clearly defined, and are approval records maintained?
High
5
Are superseded SOP versions archived but clearly marked as obsolete to prevent accidental use?
Medium
6
Is SOP update required whenever a non-conformance or process improvement identifies that the current procedure is incorrect or suboptimal?
High
7
Are the languages of SOPs appropriate for all operational staff who use them?
High
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Training, Compliance & Audit

🎯
SCOPE
Whether staff are trained to current SOPs and compliance is verified
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Are training records maintained that confirm each operator is trained to the current version of each SOP relevant to their role?
High
Training records linked to SOP version numbers allow identification of who needs retraining when an SOP is updated.
DATA SOURCE Training records, HR, Document management
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is there a mechanism to retrain staff automatically when an SOP is updated?
High
3
Are SOP compliance rates verified through observation or formal process audits at a defined frequency?
High
4
What is the SOP deviation rate identified in internal audits, and is it tracked by process area and reason?
High
5
Is there a consequence for repeated or deliberate non-compliance with SOPs, and is it applied consistently?
High
6
Are operators involved in the development and review of SOPs for their own work areas?
Medium
7
Is SOP management included in the management review agenda at least annually?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
SOP Coverage & Completeness
SOP Quality & Usability
Accessibility, Version Control & Maintenance
Training, Compliance & Audit
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
21
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AUDIT Sales&commercial | Strategy
Assess the quality and effectiveness of business development activity. Distinguishes between genuine pipeline building and relationship maintenance disguised as BD. Focus on new revenue creation, not account management.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Pipeline & Prospecting

🎯
SCOPE
Quality and volume of new business pipeline and lead generation activity
👤
TARGET
Commercial Director, BD Manager
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the total value of new business pipeline, and does it provide 3× coverage of the next 12-month new revenue target?
High
Pipeline coverage below 3× the target indicates insufficient prospecting activity. It is the earliest reliable indicator of a future revenue shortfall.
DATA SOURCE CRM, Sales data
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
How many new prospects are added to the pipeline per week, and is this tracked per BD team member?
High
3
What is the source breakdown of new leads — inbound, outbound, referral, event — and which source produces the highest conversion rate?
High
4
What is the average time from first contact to first meeting, and from first meeting to qualified opportunity?
Medium
5
Are BD targets set as leading activity metrics — calls, meetings, proposals — not only as revenue outcomes?
High
6
What percentage of the pipeline has had meaningful activity in the last 30 days, and how much is stale?
High
7
Is there a defined ideal customer profile (ICP) that guides prospecting, and is it consistently applied?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Proposition & Positioning

🎯
SCOPE
Clarity and differentiation of the value proposition in BD conversations
👤
TARGET
Commercial Director, Marketing
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Can every BD team member articulate the value proposition in one sentence — without using the words 'quality', 'service', or 'partnership'?
High
Generic value propositions produce generic responses. A specific, differentiated proposition is the foundation of effective BD.
DATA SOURCE BD team interviews
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is the value proposition differentiated by customer segment, or is one generic message used for all targets?
High
3
Are customer-facing references and case studies available for each target segment, and are they used in BD conversations?
Medium
4
Is the competitive positioning — why us vs. the two most likely alternatives — explicit and rehearsed?
High
5
Are pricing and commercial terms presented confidently and consistently, or does the BD team defer or discount under first pressure?
High
6
Is there a defined content strategy — articles, case studies, events — that positions the company as a credible voice in the target market?
Medium
7
Is the proposition reviewed and updated when competitive conditions or customer needs change?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Relationship Capital & Network

🎯
SCOPE
Quality and commercial value of existing business relationships
👤
TARGET
CEO, Commercial Director
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is the company's relationship capital — senior contacts at target accounts — documented and owned, not held only in individual BD team members' heads?
High
Relationship capital that exists only in an individual's network is lost when that person leaves. CRM must capture contact relationships, not just account data.
DATA SOURCE CRM, BD team
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What percentage of new business came from referrals in the last 12 months, and is there a formal referral activation process?
High
3
Are existing customers actively asked for referrals and introductions at defined points in the relationship?
Medium
4
Are strategic relationships — with partners, advisors, or complementary suppliers — leveraged for BD introductions?
Medium
5
Is there a defined programme for maintaining senior relationships with strategic target accounts before they have a procurement need?
High
6
Are industry events, trade associations, and speaking opportunities used as BD channels, and is their ROI tracked?
Medium
7
Is the personal network of the CEO and senior leadership team actively leveraged for BD, with a defined process?
High
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Revenue Growth Actions & Accountability

🎯
SCOPE
Execution discipline and accountability in business development
👤
TARGET
CEO, Commercial Director
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a weekly BD review that covers pipeline movement, new activity, and blockers — not just revenue actuals?
High
Revenue-only reviews are retrospective. A weekly pipeline and activity review is the only mechanism for forward-looking BD management.
DATA SOURCE CRM, Management process
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the average number of follow-up contacts made per prospect before a decision is reached, and is it sufficient?
High
3
Are lost deals formally reviewed for cause, and do patterns drive changes in proposition, targeting, or process?
High
4
Is there a defined accountability mechanism — individual BD targets, weekly reporting, and consequence for underperformance?
High
5
Are BD investments — time, events, content, tools — evaluated annually for commercial return?
Medium
6
Is there a defined new market or new segment development plan beyond the current core business?
Medium
7
What is the 12-month new business revenue target, and what specific actions — not aspirations — are planned to achieve it?
High
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Pipeline & Prospecting
Proposition & Positioning
Relationship Capital & Network
Revenue Growth Actions & Accountability
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
18
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
CUSTOMER RETENTION AUDIT Sales&commercial | Customer service
Assess the effectiveness of customer retention strategy, account management, and early churn detection. Retaining existing customers is typically 5–7× cheaper than acquiring new ones. Most companies invest the inverse ratio.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Retention Metrics & Churn Tracking

🎯
SCOPE
How customer retention is measured, tracked, and reported
👤
TARGET
Commercial Director, Finance
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the customer retention rate by segment, product, and channel — not just the blended company average?
High
Blended retention rates hide segment-specific churn that requires different interventions. Require segment-level breakdown before drawing conclusions.
DATA SOURCE CRM, Finance
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the revenue retention rate vs. the customer count retention rate, and which is more critical for the business?
High
3
Is churn tracked at the point of contract expiry, or earlier — at the point of decline in usage, engagement, or purchase frequency?
High
4
Are customers who have reduced spend by more than 20% identified and managed as at-risk accounts?
High
5
Is Net Revenue Retention (NRR) — which includes expansion and contraction within existing accounts — tracked monthly?
High
6
What is the average customer lifetime value (CLV) by segment, and is it trending up or down?
Medium
7
Is churn data fed back into the new customer acquisition process to avoid acquiring customers with high churn profiles?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Customer Experience & Satisfaction

🎯
SCOPE
The quality of the customer experience as a driver of retention
👤
TARGET
Commercial Director, COO
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is customer satisfaction formally measured at defined points in the customer journey, not only annually?
High
Annual satisfaction surveys miss the specific interaction moments that trigger churn decisions. Measure at onboarding, at key delivery points, and at renewal.
DATA SOURCE CRM, Customer survey
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What are the top 3 reasons customers cite for dissatisfaction, and is there a structured action plan for each?
High
3
Is customer onboarding managed as a retention-critical process, with defined milestones and success metrics?
High
4
Are customer-facing staff trained to identify and escalate early dissatisfaction signals — not just to manage complaints?
High
5
What is the average response time for customer issues, and is it within the SLA commitment for each issue severity level?
High
6
Is there a formal Voice of Customer (VoC) programme that feeds customer insight into product and service development?
Medium
7
Are customer satisfaction scores tracked at the account level and used in account prioritisation decisions?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Proactive Account Management

🎯
SCOPE
How existing customer relationships are actively managed to retain and grow revenue
👤
TARGET
Account Management Team, Commercial Director
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a defined account management programme with a contact cadence, review schedule, and development plan for each customer tier?
High
Reactive account management — responding only when customers contact you — is the primary cause of preventable churn in B2B.
DATA SOURCE CRM, Account management process
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are account managers' KPIs balanced between retention metrics and revenue growth within existing accounts?
High
3
What is the ratio of account manager time spent on proactive customer development vs. reactive problem resolution?
Medium
4
Is the renewal process initiated at least 90 days before contract expiry, with a defined engagement plan?
High
5
Are customers formally introduced to multiple contacts in your organisation, reducing single-point-of-contact dependency?
Medium
6
Is there a defined escalation process for at-risk accounts, with senior leadership involvement when account value warrants it?
High
7
Are post-project or post-delivery reviews conducted with customers, and do findings feed back into service improvement?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Win-Back & Re-engagement

🎯
SCOPE
How churned and dormant customers are identified and re-engaged
👤
TARGET
Commercial Director, Marketing
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a formal process for conducting exit interviews with churned customers, and is the data analysed for patterns?
High
Exit interviews are the highest-quality source of churn intelligence. Companies that skip them lose the ability to fix structural retention problems.
DATA SOURCE CRM, Commercial team
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What percentage of churned customers are re-engaged within 12 months, and is there a defined win-back programme?
Medium
3
Is there a defined category of 'dormant' customers — those who have not purchased in a defined period — and are they actively managed?
High
4
What is the conversion rate of win-back attempts, and which approach — offer, personal outreach, or new proposition — performs best?
Medium
5
Are churned customers re-entered into the BD pipeline as standard practice, or does churn create permanent exclusion?
Medium
6
Is the reason for churn documented at the customer level in the CRM, and is it used to personalise re-engagement messaging?
Medium
7
What is the 3-year revenue value of customers lost in the last 12 months, and is this calculated and presented to management?
High
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Retention Metrics & Churn Tracking
Customer Experience & Satisfaction
Proactive Account Management
Win-Back & Re-engagement
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
17
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
DISTRIBUTOR SALES AUDIT Sales&commercial | Operational
Assess the commercial performance, activity level, and sales effectiveness of the distributor network. Identifies which distributors are genuinely developing the market and which are order-taking or stagnating.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Distributor Sales Performance

🎯
SCOPE
Revenue, growth, and market development results per distributor
👤
TARGET
Channel Director, Sales Director
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the revenue performance of each distributor vs. target, and which distributors account for 80% of total channel revenue?
High
The 80/20 rule almost always applies to distributor networks. Identify the critical few and assess whether they are growing or declining.
DATA SOURCE Sales data, CRM
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the sell-through rate for each distributor — actual end-customer sales vs. purchase-in — and is it tracked monthly?
High
3
What is the year-on-year revenue growth rate per distributor, and how does it compare to market growth in their territory?
High
4
Which product categories or SKUs are underrepresented in distributor sales relative to their market potential?
Medium
5
What is the average order frequency and order value per distributor, and are they trending up or down?
High
6
Are there distributors growing revenue only through price increases rather than volume growth?
Medium
7
What is the revenue contribution of the top 3 new customers acquired by each distributor in the last 12 months?
High
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Sales Support & Enablement

🎯
SCOPE
What the manufacturer provides to enable distributor sales success
👤
TARGET
Sales Director, Marketing
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Do distributors have access to current, localised sales materials — in their language, with relevant local references?
High
Sales materials that are not in the local language or do not feature relevant local cases are not used. Confirm what materials distributors actually use in sales meetings.
DATA SOURCE Marketing, Distributor feedback
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are product demonstrations, samples, and display materials available to all distributors who need them?
High
3
Is there a dedicated sales support contact for each distributor — not a generic helpdesk — who knows the local market?
Medium
4
Are digital sales tools — configurators, pricing calculators, product selectors — available to distributor sales teams?
Medium
5
What co-marketing support is available to distributors for local market development, and is it tied to activity plans?
Medium
6
Is there a formal process for distributors to request custom pricing for specific competitive situations, and is it managed within a defined response time?
High
7
Are competitive intelligence — market conditions, competitor moves, pricing — shared with distributors in a structured format?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Joint Business Planning

🎯
SCOPE
Collaborative planning and mutual commitment to growth
👤
TARGET
Channel Manager, Commercial Director
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a written joint business plan agreed with each distributor annually, covering targets, activities, and mutual investment?
High
A joint business plan creates shared ownership. One-sided plans where only the distributor commits to revenue targets are not partnerships.
DATA SOURCE CRM, Commercial process
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Does the joint business plan include a new customer acquisition target with a defined approach per territory?
High
3
Are joint business plan reviews conducted quarterly, with formal assessment of progress and updated actions?
High
4
Do distributors contribute market intelligence — customer needs, competitor activity, pricing pressure — as part of the planning process?
Medium
5
Is there a product assortment recommendation per territory in the joint plan, based on market analysis not just manufacturer preference?
Medium
6
Are distributor investment commitments — in stock, training, and marketing — specified and tracked in the joint plan?
High
7
Is there a named account list in each joint plan — specific target customers — rather than only a revenue target?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Field Activity & Market Coverage

🎯
SCOPE
Sales activity in the field and geographic market coverage quality
👤
TARGET
Channel Manager, Sales Director
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the number of end-customer sales calls made per distributor sales representative per week, and is it within the target range?
High
Field activity is the primary driver of distributor sales performance. Track calls per rep per week as a leading indicator.
DATA SOURCE Distributor CRM, Field reports
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the conversion rate from distributor sales calls to proposals, and from proposals to orders?
High
3
Are there territories or segments within each distributor's area that are systematically undercovered?
Medium
4
Does the manufacturer conduct regular joint customer visits with distributor sales teams?
High
5
What is the ratio of time distributor sales reps spend with existing customers vs. prospecting for new customers?
Medium
6
Are demonstration events, product launches, and training days for end-customers executed in each territory, and are results tracked?
Medium
7
What is the end-customer complaint rate attributable to distributor sales or service, and is it tracked per distributor?
High
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Distributor Sales Performance
Sales Support & Enablement
Joint Business Planning
Field Activity & Market Coverage
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
16
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
NEGOTIATION AUDIT Sales&commercial | HR/People
Assess negotiation preparation, strategy, and execution capability across commercial and leadership contexts. Poor negotiation consistently leaves value on the table and signals weakness to counterparts.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Preparation & Strategy

🎯
SCOPE
The quality of preparation before entering a negotiation
👤
TARGET
Commercial Team, Management
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a written negotiation brief for every significant negotiation — covering objectives, BATNA, walk-away point, and concession strategy?
High
Entering a negotiation without a written brief means improvising under pressure. The brief forces structured thinking before emotion enters the room.
DATA SOURCE Commercial process, CRM
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is the counterpart's BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) researched and assessed before the negotiation begins?
High
3
Is a walk-away point defined in advance and held regardless of in-negotiation pressure?
High
4
Is the full value of the deal — not just price — mapped before negotiation, including payment terms, volume, service level, and duration?
High
5
Are negotiating team roles defined in advance — lead, observer, technical expert — and is there a pre-agreed signal for requesting a break?
Medium
6
Is competitive intelligence on the counterpart's alternatives gathered before price-sensitive negotiations?
Medium
7
Are minimum acceptable outcomes — the floor on each variable — defined and documented before the negotiation?
High
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Opening & Anchoring

🎯
SCOPE
How negotiations are opened and initial positions established
👤
TARGET
Commercial Team
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Does the team open negotiations with a well-reasoned first offer, or does it wait for the counterpart to anchor first?
High
Anchoring first — when you have sufficient information — produces systematically better outcomes than responding to the counterpart's anchor.
DATA SOURCE Training records, Commercial interviews
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is the first offer ambitious but defensible — supported by a specific rationale — rather than a round number guess?
High
3
Is the team trained to label the counterpart's anchor as unexpected rather than accepting it as a reference point?
Medium
4
Are opening positions documented before each negotiation round so that concession size can be tracked vs. plan?
Medium
5
Is silence used as a negotiating tool — after making an offer or receiving a counterproposal?
Medium
6
Is the team trained to avoid making the first concession, and to give the counterpart the opportunity to move first?
High
7
Are aggressive or extreme counterpart positions responded to calmly and factually, without emotional reaction?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Value Exchange & Concession Management

🎯
SCOPE
How concessions are made and value is exchanged during negotiation
👤
TARGET
Commercial Team, Management
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is every concession made conditional on a reciprocal concession from the counterpart?
High
Unconditional concessions train the counterpart to ask for more. 'If you can do X, we can consider Y' is the correct concession frame.
DATA SOURCE Commercial training, Observation
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are concessions planned in advance — with a defined number of moves and decreasing size — rather than improvised?
High
3
Is the team trained to concede slowly and reluctantly, regardless of how much room remains in the negotiation?
Medium
4
Are non-monetary variables — payment terms, volume commitment, exclusivity period, service level — used as concession currency rather than only price?
High
5
Is there a documented concession log for each negotiation round, tracking what was given, what was received, and the net value?
High
6
Is the team trained to reframe value — moving from cost to investment, from price to ROI — rather than defending price under pressure?
Medium
7
Is there a defined sign-off level for concessions above a defined financial threshold, and is it enforced in real time?
High
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Closing, Documentation & Review

🎯
SCOPE
How negotiations are closed and learnings captured
👤
TARGET
Commercial Team, Legal
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a defined closing technique used to move negotiations to conclusion rather than allowing them to drift?
High
Negotiations that drift beyond their natural closing point lose momentum and create re-opening risk. Define the close and execute it.
DATA SOURCE Commercial training, CRM
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are verbal agreements confirmed in writing within 24 hours of a negotiation session?
High
3
Is there a post-negotiation review that assesses the outcome vs. the pre-negotiation brief and identifies learnings?
High
4
Are negotiation outcomes tracked in CRM with the pre-negotiation target, the final outcome, and the concession log?
Medium
5
Is the full cost of the agreed commercial terms — including payment terms, warranty, service level — calculated before sign-off?
High
6
Are negotiation skills formally assessed in commercial role performance reviews, and is training provided based on gaps?
Medium
7
Is the counterpart's negotiation style and patterns documented for future reference in the CRM account record?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Preparation & Strategy
Opening & Anchoring
Value Exchange & Concession Management
Closing, Documentation & Review
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
17
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
PRICING AUDIT Financial | Sales&commercial
Assess the pricing strategy, execution discipline, and margin management across the product and customer portfolio. Pricing is the highest-leverage commercial variable — a 1% price improvement typically delivers 8–10% operating profit uplift.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Pricing Strategy & Positioning

🎯
SCOPE
The logic and structure of pricing relative to value and competition
👤
TARGET
CFO, Commercial Director
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a documented pricing strategy that defines the basis for pricing — value-based, cost-plus, competitive, or market-rate — and is it applied consistently?
High
Companies without a documented pricing strategy make pricing decisions by instinct, precedent, or sales pressure. Each produces different and conflicting outcomes.
DATA SOURCE Commercial policy, Finance
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is pricing set relative to the value delivered to the customer, or only relative to internal cost?
High
3
Is the price positioning — premium, at-market, or below-market — for each product or service intentional and documented?
High
4
Are price differences between customer segments, geographies, and channels defined and managed?
High
5
Is the pricing architecture — list price, standard discount, volume band, and floor — documented and controlled?
High
6
When did the company last conduct a formal price sensitivity analysis or willingness-to-pay study for key products?
Medium
7
Is there a defined price review cycle — typically annual — aligned with cost changes and market conditions?
High
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Cost-to-Serve & Margin Analysis

🎯
SCOPE
The true margin delivered by each customer, product, and channel
👤
TARGET
CFO, Finance Manager
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is margin calculated at the customer level — not just the product level — including cost-to-serve, credit, and logistics?
High
Product margin without customer-level cost-to-serve misrepresents profitability. A high-volume customer with high service cost may be less profitable than a smaller, low-maintenance customer.
DATA SOURCE Finance, CRM
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Which customers or segments are below the minimum acceptable margin threshold, and what is the plan to address them?
High
3
Are the true costs of special pricing arrangements — custom products, extended payment terms, dedicated service — included in margin calculations?
High
4
Is there a minimum margin floor below which no deal can be approved, regardless of relationship or volume?
High
5
Are product line margins reviewed quarterly to identify lines that are structurally unviable at current pricing?
High
6
What is the true net margin after all trade spend — rebates, co-marketing funds, samples, and returns — for each major customer?
High
7
Is there a product complexity cost — for custom variants, low-volume SKUs, or short runs — included in pricing for non-standard orders?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Price Execution & Discipline

🎯
SCOPE
Whether agreed pricing is executed consistently in practice
👤
TARGET
CFO, Commercial Director
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the actual average selling price vs. list price across the portfolio, and how has the gap trended over 3 years?
High
A widening gap between list and actual price is evidence of structural discounting. Track and present the 'price waterfall' from list to net.
DATA SOURCE Finance, CRM
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are discounting decisions made against defined criteria, or are they made individually by sales managers without reference to a policy?
High
3
What is the discount approval matrix — who can approve what level of discount — and is it enforced in the CRM and order system?
High
4
Are post-deal margin reports provided to the sales team, showing actual vs. target margin per deal?
High
5
Is there a price increase process with a defined implementation cadence and customer communication plan?
High
6
Are one-off pricing exceptions tracked and reviewed annually to identify patterns that should be formalised or closed?
Medium
7
Is there a win/loss analysis that distinguishes deals lost on price from deals lost on value proposition or fit?
High
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Competitive Monitoring & Price Intelligence

🎯
SCOPE
How competitive pricing is tracked and used in commercial decisions
👤
TARGET
Commercial Director, Marketing
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is competitor pricing actively monitored at a defined frequency, and is the intelligence shared with commercial decision-makers?
High
Competitor pricing intelligence gathered ad hoc and not distributed is not usable. Define the monitoring process, frequency, and distribution.
DATA SOURCE Commercial team, Marketing
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are win/loss interviews conducted with lost prospects to confirm the role of pricing vs. other decision factors?
High
3
Is the company's price position vs. competitors tracked by segment and updated at least quarterly?
Medium
4
Are there markets or segments where pricing is being undercut by competitors using a structurally different cost model?
High
5
Is pricing intelligence from the field — sales team, distributors, customers — collected in a structured format and reviewed monthly?
Medium
6
Is there a defined response to a competitor price attack — a structured decision tree that avoids reflexive price matching?
High
7
Are price changes tested in limited geographies or segments before full portfolio implementation?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Pricing Strategy & Positioning
Cost-to-Serve & Margin Analysis
Price Execution & Discipline
Competitive Monitoring & Price Intelligence
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
22
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
SALES PROCESS AUDIT Sales&commercial | Operational
Assess the quality, consistency, and management discipline of the sales process from lead to close. A well-defined and managed sales process is the difference between a repeatable commercial system and a collection of individual behaviours.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Lead Generation & Qualification

🎯
SCOPE
How leads are generated, qualified, and entered into the sales pipeline
👤
TARGET
Sales Director, Marketing
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a documented lead qualification framework — defining what constitutes a qualified lead — and is it applied consistently by all sales team members?
High
Unqualified leads in the pipeline inflate coverage ratios, distort conversion metrics, and waste sales time. A qualification framework prevents this.
DATA SOURCE CRM, Sales process
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the marketing-to-sales lead handover process, and is there a defined service level agreement for lead follow-up time?
High
3
What percentage of pipeline value consists of truly qualified opportunities vs. entries that have not been verified?
High
4
Is there a defined minimum qualification standard — budget confirmed, authority identified, need established, timeline agreed — before a lead progresses to active pipeline?
High
5
Are lead sources tracked in CRM and conversion rates reported per source at monthly review?
Medium
6
What is the average lead response time from first contact to first meaningful sales conversation, by channel?
High
7
Is there a defined process for recycling leads that are not ready to buy into a nurture sequence rather than dropping them?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Sales Methodology & Stage Management

🎯
SCOPE
How sales opportunities are developed and advanced through defined stages
👤
TARGET
Sales Director, Sales Manager
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a defined sales methodology — consultative, challenger, solution selling — adopted and trained across the sales team?
High
Teams without a shared methodology produce inconsistent quality in discovery, presentation, and closing. Methodology training creates a common standard.
DATA SOURCE Training records, Sales process
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are pipeline stages defined with specific criteria for entry and exit — not just time or gut feel?
High
3
What is the average time an opportunity spends at each pipeline stage, and are there stages where deals routinely stall?
High
4
Are sales calls and customer meetings debriefed against a standard framework to capture what was learned and what the next action is?
Medium
5
What percentage of sales meetings include a defined next step agreed with the customer before the meeting ends?
High
6
Is discovery — understanding the customer's situation, problem, and buying criteria — consistently done before presentation begins?
High
7
Are opportunity risk factors — competitor involvement, decision timeline, internal sponsor strength — formally assessed for deals above a value threshold?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Proposal, Negotiation & Closing

🎯
SCOPE
The quality of proposal development and commercial closing
👤
TARGET
Sales Director, Commercial Team
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a proposal template and quality standard, with a defined review process for high-value proposals?
High
Proposals with no quality standard are inconsistent in messaging, format, and commercial clarity. A review process improves quality and reduces errors.
DATA SOURCE Commercial process, Sales team
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are proposals tailored to the specific situation uncovered in discovery, or are they largely template-based?
High
3
Is the proposal approval process — for pricing, terms, and scope — completed before the proposal is sent?
High
4
What is the win rate on proposals by sales representative and by customer segment, and is it reviewed monthly?
High
5
Is there a defined follow-up cadence after a proposal is submitted, with escalation if the customer goes silent?
High
6
Are closing techniques trained and practised, and is there evidence they are used in real sales situations?
Medium
7
Is there a formal handover process from the sales team to the delivery team, with customer commitments documented?
High
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

CRM Usage & Pipeline Visibility

🎯
SCOPE
Data quality, discipline, and management use of CRM
👤
TARGET
Sales Director, IT
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What percentage of active pipeline opportunities are updated in CRM within the last 7 days?
High
CRM data that is more than a week old is unreliable for management decisions. Require weekly updates as a non-negotiable discipline.
DATA SOURCE CRM
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is CRM usage mandatory and verified, or is it optional and inconsistent across the sales team?
High
3
Are management pipeline reviews conducted using live CRM data, not summary slides prepared by the sales team?
High
4
Is CRM integrated with finance, marketing, and customer service systems to provide a single view of the customer?
Medium
5
What CRM fields are mandatory, and are they consistently completed for all opportunities above a defined value threshold?
High
6
Are lost deal reasons coded consistently in CRM, and is the data reviewed monthly to identify patterns?
High
7
Is sales forecast accuracy tracked — comparing forecast at 30, 60, 90 days to actual close — and used to assess individual forecasting quality?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Lead Generation & Qualification
Sales Methodology & Stage Management
Proposal, Negotiation & Closing
CRM Usage & Pipeline Visibility
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
21
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
BUSINESS RECOVERY AUDIT Financial | Strategy | Risk management
Structured assessment of a company in financial or operational distress. Identifies the root causes of decline, evaluates the viability of recovery, and determines which actions must be taken — and in what sequence — to stabilise and rebuild the business.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Crisis Diagnosis

🎯
SCOPE
Identify the primary causes of business decline: financial mismanagement, market loss, operational failure, or leadership breakdown. Distinguish between symptoms and root causes.
👤
TARGET
CEO, CFO, Interim Manager, Board
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
When did financial performance first deteriorate, and what internal or external event triggered it?
High
Look for a clear inflection point. If management cannot identify one, the decline is likely structural and ongoing.
DATA SOURCE P&L trend last 3 years, board minutes
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What is the current cash burn rate, and how many weeks of runway remain at current spend?
High
3
Which product lines, customers, or markets are generating losses, and have these been quantified?
High
4
Has the company lost key customers, contracts, or revenue streams in the past 12–18 months? What caused the losses?
High
5
Are current leadership and management capable of executing a recovery, or is there a competency gap?
High
6
What obligations — debt, leases, supplier contracts — are overdue or at risk of default?
High
7
Is there a documented understanding of why the business is in distress, shared and accepted by leadership?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Stabilisation Capacity

🎯
SCOPE
Assess whether the company has sufficient resources, relationships, and internal capability to stabilise operations within 30–60 days before a full recovery plan is executed.
👤
TARGET
Interim Manager, CFO, Operations Director
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Can payroll and critical supplier payments be met for the next 60 days without external financing?
High
Payroll default triggers immediate legal and reputational damage. This is a hard constraint, not a planning assumption.
DATA SOURCE Cash forecast, payroll schedule
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are key employees — those essential to operations and customer relationships — at risk of leaving?
High
3
What cost reductions can be implemented within 30 days without destroying customer delivery or operational capacity?
High
4
Are there receivables that can be accelerated to improve immediate cash position?
Medium
5
Which operational processes are at risk of breaking down due to reduced resources or staff stress?
Medium
6
Does the company have assets — equipment, IP, inventory, real estate — that could be liquidated or used as collateral?
Medium
7
Are key suppliers still delivering, and what is their current level of trust in the company's ability to pay?
High
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Recovery Plan Viability

🎯
SCOPE
Evaluate whether the proposed or intended recovery plan is realistic, sequenced correctly, and based on verified assumptions — not wishful thinking.
👤
TARGET
CEO, Board, Interim Manager, Investors
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a written recovery plan with specific actions, owners, and 30/60/90-day milestones?
High
A plan that exists only in the CEO's head is not a plan. Specificity and ownership are non-negotiable.
DATA SOURCE Recovery plan document
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are the revenue assumptions in the recovery plan supported by confirmed orders or realistic pipeline data?
High
3
Does the plan address the root cause of decline, or only the symptoms (cost cuts, refinancing)?
High
4
What is the break-even point under the recovery scenario, and when is it realistically reached?
High
5
Have key stakeholders — bank, major creditors, key customers — been informed and do they support the recovery direction?
Medium
6
Is the recovery plan stress-tested against a downside scenario (revenue 20% below plan)?
Medium
7
Who is accountable for recovery plan execution, and do they have the authority to make decisions at the required speed?
High
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Long-Term Viability Assessment

🎯
SCOPE
Determine whether the business has a viable future after stabilisation — including whether the market, product, and competitive position justify continued investment versus an orderly wind-down.
👤
TARGET
Board, Investors, Senior Management
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Does the core business model generate positive contribution margin when stripped of all non-essential costs?
High
If the business cannot generate contribution margin at any scale, it is structurally unviable regardless of intervention.
DATA SOURCE Contribution margin analysis
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is there still a relevant market for the company's core products or services, with customers willing to pay at required margins?
High
3
What competitive differentiation does the business retain that can be rebuilt or leveraged in recovery?
Medium
4
Are there structural issues — technology gap, regulatory exposure, irreversible reputation damage — that make recovery unlikely regardless of financial intervention?
High
5
If the business were to be sold or merged today, what would it realistically fetch, and is that better than continuation?
Medium
6
What is the minimum viable version of the business that could be profitable — and is it achievable within 12 months?
High
7
Has the board formally evaluated all options — restructure, sale, partial wind-down, administration — and documented the rationale for the chosen path?
High
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Crisis Diagnosis
Stabilisation Capacity
Recovery Plan Viability
Long-Term Viability Assessment
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
20
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
CASH CRISIS AUDIT Financial | Risk management
Focused assessment for companies experiencing acute cash shortfall. Identifies the immediate causes of cash depletion, evaluates short-term options to extend runway, and determines what decisions must be made within days — not weeks — to prevent insolvency.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Cash Position & Burn Rate

🎯
SCOPE
Establish an accurate, real-time view of available cash, committed outflows, and the timeline to zero. No recovery action is meaningful without this baseline.
👤
TARGET
CFO, Finance Director, Interim Manager
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
What is the exact cash balance across all bank accounts and facilities as of today?
High
Include restricted cash separately. Do not use accounting balances — use live bank balances.
DATA SOURCE Bank statements, treasury system
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
What are all committed cash outflows in the next 30 days, and which cannot be deferred?
High
3
At current burn rate, how many days of liquidity does the business have?
High
4
Has burn rate increased in the past 90 days, and if so, what caused the acceleration?
High
5
Are there undrawn credit facilities, overdraft lines, or invoice financing arrangements available immediately?
High
6
What is the current debtor book value, and what portion is collectible within 14 days?
High
7
Are any tax payments — VAT, payroll tax, corporate tax — overdue or at risk of triggering enforcement?
High
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Immediate Cash Generation Options

🎯
SCOPE
Identify all actions that can generate or preserve cash within 7–30 days, without requiring new financing or major structural change.
👤
TARGET
CFO, CEO, Operations Director
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Which customer invoices can be collected immediately through direct contact, early payment incentives, or escalation?
High
A 2–3% early payment discount is cheap compared to a bank overdraft. Start with the largest overdue balances.
DATA SOURCE Aged debtors, customer contact list
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Which supplier payments can be deferred by 30–60 days through direct negotiation, without triggering supply disruption?
High
3
Is there slow-moving or obsolete inventory that can be liquidated quickly, even at a discount?
Medium
4
Are there non-core assets — vehicles, equipment, property, IP — that can be sold or used in a sale-leaseback arrangement?
Medium
5
Can any customer contracts be pre-billed, or deposits requested for upcoming work?
Medium
6
Are there subscriptions, licences, or service contracts that can be cancelled immediately to reduce outflow?
Low
7
Can any planned capital expenditure be delayed by 90 days without operational consequence?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Financing & Stakeholder Options

🎯
SCOPE
Evaluate all external financing options — bank, shareholders, alternative lenders, creditors — and assess the speed and probability of securing additional liquidity.
👤
TARGET
CEO, CFO, Board
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Have the company's existing bankers been informed of the cash position, and what is their current position on support?
High
Banks that are surprised by a crisis withdraw support faster. Early, honest communication preserves options.
DATA SOURCE Bank relationship records, recent correspondence
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are shareholders or investors willing and able to provide emergency funding, and what are their conditions?
High
3
Is the company eligible for government-backed or alternative lender financing (revenue-based financing, asset finance)?
Medium
4
Can any major creditors be approached to convert outstanding debt to a payment plan or equity arrangement?
Medium
5
Have any customers been approached for advance payments or contract acceleration in exchange for price concessions?
Medium
6
Is a formal insolvency or restructuring advisor already engaged, and if not, at what cash threshold should one be appointed?
High
7
What is the legal position of directors if trading continues beyond the point of inevitable insolvency?
High
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Cash Control & Governance

🎯
SCOPE
Assess whether the company has sufficient financial controls and decision-making authority to manage a cash crisis effectively — including daily visibility, approval limits, and escalation protocols.
👤
TARGET
CFO, CEO, Board, Interim Manager
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a daily cash flow report, reviewed by the CFO or equivalent, showing inflows, outflows, and closing balance?
High
In a cash crisis, cash position is monitored daily, not monthly. If this does not exist, it must be built today.
DATA SOURCE Cash reporting system, CFO sign-off
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are all non-essential purchase orders and payment authorisations frozen pending crisis review?
High
3
Is there a single person with authority to approve all cash payments above a defined threshold?
High
4
Does the board have real-time visibility of the cash position, and have they formally acknowledged the crisis?
High
5
Are there any payments being made that could be classified as preferential treatment of creditors?
High
6
Is there a crisis communication plan for customers, suppliers, and staff that controls messaging and prevents panic?
Medium
7
Has a 13-week cash flow model been built, updated weekly, and reviewed with the board?
High
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Cash Position & Burn Rate
Immediate Cash Generation Options
Financing & Stakeholder Options
Cash Control & Governance
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
19
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
TURNAROUND DECISION AUDIT Strategy | Risk management
Structured decision framework for assessing whether a business in distress should be turned around, sold, restructured, or wound down. Forces a factual, unsentimental evaluation of viability before committing to a recovery path.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Business Viability Assessment

🎯
SCOPE
Determine whether the core business model has the commercial foundation to support recovery — regardless of current financial condition.
👤
TARGET
Board, Investors, Interim Manager
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is the company's core product or service still in demand in its target market at margins that can sustain the business?
High
Market demand is the first test. A business with no customers cannot be turned around — it must be replaced.
DATA SOURCE Market data, customer interviews, sales reports
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Does the company have a differentiated position that competitors cannot easily replicate?
High
3
What percentage of current revenue comes from repeat customers or contracted income?
High
4
Has the company lost its primary market position — key accounts, distribution channels, brand relevance — in the past 24 months?
High
5
Can the business reach cash-flow break-even within 12 months with realistic cost and revenue assumptions?
High
6
Are there identifiable buyers, partners, or investors who would value the business or its assets?
Medium
7
What is the minimum viable version of this business — stripped to its most profitable core — and is that version sustainable?
High
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Root Cause Identification

🎯
SCOPE
Identify the primary driver(s) of decline — financial mismanagement, market shift, operational failure, leadership deficit, or external shock — and determine whether each is addressable.
👤
TARGET
Interim Manager, Board, Management Team
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is the decline primarily driven by internal factors (costs, leadership, operations) or external factors (market, competition, regulation)?
High
Internal causes are more controllable. External causes may require a strategic pivot, not just operational fixes.
DATA SOURCE P&L analysis, market data, management interviews
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Has management accurately diagnosed the root cause, or are they addressing symptoms while the underlying problem continues?
High
3
Were there early warning signals that were ignored or misinterpreted by management or the board?
Medium
4
Is the leadership team that caused the decline the same team being asked to lead the recovery?
High
5
Are there operational root causes — process failures, quality issues, IT breakdowns — that have not been addressed?
Medium
6
Has the company been structurally over-invested — too much fixed cost, excess capacity, overextended premises — relative to its revenue base?
High
7
Are there identifiable decisions — acquisitions, contracts, investments — that created the current situation and are now understood?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Options Analysis

🎯
SCOPE
Evaluate all strategic options — full turnaround, partial restructure, sale, merger, administration — and determine which option maximises value for stakeholders.
👤
TARGET
Board, Investors, Legal Advisors
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Has the board formally considered all options — full recovery, partial recovery, sale, merger, administration — with written analysis of each?
High
Directors are legally required to consider all options. Undocumented decisions increase personal liability.
DATA SOURCE Board minutes, options analysis document
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is there a buyer or investor who could acquire the business or its assets at a price better than wind-down value?
Medium
3
What is the estimated recovery value for creditors under each option (turnaround vs. sale vs. administration)?
High
4
Is there a strategic partner — distributor, customer, competitor — who would benefit from acquiring or merging with this business?
Medium
5
If the business is to be restructured, what specifically will be closed, sold, or wound down — and what will remain?
High
6
What are the costs and timelines of each option, including redundancy, lease break penalties, and advisor fees?
High
7
Has independent legal and financial advice been obtained to validate the chosen option?
High
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Stakeholder Alignment

🎯
SCOPE
Assess the degree of alignment — or misalignment — among key stakeholders (board, investors, creditors, management) on the chosen path, and identify what is needed to secure their support.
👤
TARGET
CEO, Board, CFO, Legal Advisors
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Do the board and major shareholders agree on the diagnosis of the problem and the chosen recovery or exit path?
High
Disagreement at board level paralyses execution. Identify dissenting positions and address them before proceeding.
DATA SOURCE Board meeting records, shareholder correspondence
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Have secured creditors (banks, asset financiers) been briefed, and what is their current position on support?
High
3
Are key unsecured creditors (major suppliers, landlords) aware of the situation and engaged in constructive dialogue?
High
4
Is the management team aligned on the chosen path, and are key individuals committed to staying through execution?
High
5
Have key customers been managed appropriately — informed enough to maintain confidence, but not alarmed?
High
6
Are there employee representatives, unions, or works councils whose engagement is required before restructuring decisions can be implemented?
Medium
7
Is there a communication plan that controls the narrative — internally and externally — during the turnaround process?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Business Viability Assessment
Root Cause Identification
Options Analysis
Stakeholder Alignment
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
20
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
FIRST 100 DAYS AUDIT Strategy | HR/People | Risk management
Assessment framework for interim managers, new CEOs, or turnaround leaders entering a distressed or underperforming business. Evaluates whether the first 100 days are being used to build the right foundation: diagnosis, quick wins, trust, and a credible plan — not premature action.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Entry & Diagnosis

🎯
SCOPE
Assess the quality and speed of the initial diagnosis phase — including stakeholder mapping, financial assessment, operational review, and identification of urgent vs. structural issues.
👤
TARGET
Incoming Leader, Board, Sponsor
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Has a structured diagnostic been completed within the first 30 days covering financials, operations, people, and market position?
High
Entry without diagnosis leads to action on incomplete information. The first 30 days are for understanding, not deciding.
DATA SOURCE Diagnostic report, meeting notes
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Have all key stakeholders — board, senior management, key customers, key suppliers, creditors — been met individually within the first 3 weeks?
High
3
Has the incoming leader identified the 3–5 most critical issues that require immediate attention versus issues that can wait?
High
4
Is there an accurate picture of the financial position — cash, debt, obligations, run rate — built from primary data, not management presentations?
High
5
Has the incoming leader identified who in the organisation can be trusted, who is capable, and who is a risk to execution?
High
6
Are there quick wins — low-effort, high-visibility improvements — identifiable within the first 30 days that can build credibility?
Medium
7
Has the incoming leader resisted the pressure to announce a detailed plan before the diagnostic is complete?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Quick Wins & Stabilisation

🎯
SCOPE
Evaluate whether the incoming leader has identified and executed early stabilisation actions that stop the bleeding, build confidence, and demonstrate competence — without committing to a full strategy prematurely.
👤
TARGET
Incoming Leader, Senior Management Team
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Have the most visible operational or financial problems been addressed within the first 30–45 days?
Medium
Quick wins must be real — not cosmetic. Focus on issues that staff and stakeholders have been aware of and frustrated by.
DATA SOURCE Action log, staff feedback
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Has cash burn been stabilised or reduced through immediate cost control actions?
High
3
Have customer-facing issues — delivery failures, quality problems, relationship gaps — been addressed as a priority?
High
4
Has the incoming leader established a regular cadence of communication with the team — not announcements, but genuine dialogue?
Medium
5
Are there any people decisions — roles that are clearly wrong, urgent hires, acting appointments — that have been actioned?
Medium
6
Have board expectations been managed — providing regular updates without overpromising?
High
7
Is there visible progress in the areas the organisation was told would be addressed first?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Strategy & Plan Development

🎯
SCOPE
Assess whether the 60–90 day plan development phase is producing a credible, evidenced recovery or transformation strategy — not a repackaging of existing management thinking.
👤
TARGET
Incoming Leader, Board, Senior Team
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is the recovery or transformation plan based on diagnostic findings, not on pre-existing assumptions brought by the incoming leader?
High
Leaders who arrive with their plan already decided ignore evidence. The plan must emerge from the diagnosis.
DATA SOURCE Plan document, diagnostic link
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Does the plan identify what must stop, what must change, and what must start — not just what must be improved?
High
3
Are the plan's financial assumptions (revenue recovery, cost reduction, capex) supported by evidence and tested against a downside scenario?
High
4
Has the plan been stress-tested by an external party — advisor, non-executive, or independent expert?
Medium
5
Are there clear milestones at 30, 60, 90, and 180 days against which progress will be measured?
High
6
Does the plan reflect input from the organisation — not just senior management but operational staff who understand the detail?
Medium
7
Has the plan been formally presented to and approved by the board, with clear accountability for delivery?
High
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Culture & Trust Building

🎯
SCOPE
Evaluate how effectively the incoming leader is building the trust, psychological safety, and cultural conditions needed for sustained execution — particularly in a stressed or resistant organisation.
👤
TARGET
Incoming Leader, HR, Board
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is the incoming leader visible and present on the floor — not managed from behind closed doors or remote locations?
High
Physical presence signals commitment. Remote leadership in a crisis organisation creates distance and speculation.
DATA SOURCE Leadership behaviour observation, staff feedback
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Have honest conversations been had with the organisation about the seriousness of the situation, without creating panic?
High
3
Are decisions being made at appropriate speed — fast enough to signal action, deliberate enough to avoid costly mistakes?
Medium
4
Is there evidence of the incoming leader changing their position when presented with better information or challenge?
Medium
5
Are there signs of internal resistance or sabotage — passive non-compliance, information withholding, competing agendas?
High
6
Has the incoming leader avoided taking sides in existing internal conflicts or political dynamics?
Medium
7
Is the organisation beginning to believe that recovery is possible — is there a measurable shift in morale or confidence?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Entry & Diagnosis
Quick Wins & Stabilisation
Strategy & Plan Development
Culture & Trust Building
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
16
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
RESTRUCTURING AUDIT Operational | HR/People | Risk management
Assessment of a planned or in-progress organisational or operational restructuring. Evaluates whether the restructuring is correctly scoped, properly sequenced, legally compliant, and likely to deliver the intended outcome — rather than creating new problems while solving old ones.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Restructuring Design & Scope

🎯
SCOPE
Evaluate whether the restructuring has been correctly designed — with a clear rationale, defined scope, and realistic assumptions about what will change and what will not.
👤
TARGET
CEO, CFO, Restructuring Lead, Board
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is the restructuring scope clearly defined — what is in scope, what is out of scope, and why?
High
Scope creep in restructuring programmes destroys timelines and budgets. The boundary must be explicit.
DATA SOURCE Restructuring plan, scope document
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Does the restructuring address the root cause of underperformance, or is it primarily a cost-reduction exercise?
High
3
Has the target operating model been defined — what the organisation will look like after restructuring is complete?
High
4
Are the financial savings or efficiency gains quantified, with a clear link between structural change and expected outcome?
High
5
Has the restructuring been sized correctly — not so deep that capability is destroyed, not so shallow that the problem persists?
High
6
Are there interdependencies between restructured areas that could cause unintended operational failures?
Medium
7
Has an independent review of the restructuring design been conducted before implementation begins?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Legal & HR Compliance

🎯
SCOPE
Assess whether the restructuring process is legally compliant — covering redundancy consultation, TUPE, works council obligations, contractual requirements, and director duties.
👤
TARGET
HR Director, Legal Counsel, CEO
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Have all redundancy consultation obligations been met — including the minimum statutory consultation periods?
High
Collective redundancy rules vary by jurisdiction. Failure to consult is automatically unfair dismissal in most EU countries.
DATA SOURCE HR records, legal advice, consultation timeline
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are there TUPE (Transfer of Undertaking) obligations relevant to any outsourcing, sale of division, or service provider change within the restructuring?
High
3
Have works councils or employee representative bodies been informed and consulted in accordance with their statutory rights?
High
4
Are selection criteria for redundancy objective, consistently applied, and documented?
High
5
Are enhanced redundancy packages or retention payments compliant with existing employment contracts and collective agreements?
Medium
6
Have all director duties — including obligations to creditors where insolvency risk exists — been reviewed by legal counsel?
High
7
Is there a signed-off legal risk register for the restructuring, reviewed and approved by the board?
High
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Communication & Change Management

🎯
SCOPE
Evaluate the quality of the communication strategy and change management approach — both for those leaving and those staying — during and after the restructuring.
👤
TARGET
HR Director, CEO, Communications Lead
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is there a communication plan that sequences what is said, to whom, and when — including a clear announcement day protocol?
High
Uncontrolled information flow before announcement day destroys trust and creates legal risk. Sequence is everything.
DATA SOURCE Communication plan, announcement protocol
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Have managers been briefed and trained on how to have redundancy conversations before announcements are made?
High
3
Is there a plan for the people who remain — addressing morale, workload redistribution, and the 'survivor syndrome' risk?
High
4
Are outplacement support, career transition assistance, and notice arrangements in place for those leaving?
Medium
5
Is the external communication strategy — for customers, suppliers, press — aligned with the internal announcement timing?
Medium
6
Has the leadership team been aligned on the rationale and messaging before any communication goes out?
High
7
Is there a feedback mechanism for employees during the restructuring period — a way to ask questions and receive honest answers?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Execution & Post-Restructuring Stability

🎯
SCOPE
Assess whether the restructuring is being executed to plan, and whether post-restructuring stabilisation measures are in place to prevent performance deterioration after the change is made.
👤
TARGET
CEO, Operations Director, HR Director
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is restructuring execution tracked against a detailed project plan with weekly milestones and named owners?
High
Restructuring without a project management framework slips, creating extended uncertainty that is more damaging than a clean break.
DATA SOURCE Project plan, weekly status report
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Have the operational risks of restructuring — process gaps, knowledge loss, capacity reduction — been identified and mitigated?
High
3
Is there a 90-day post-restructuring performance monitoring plan to detect unintended operational failures quickly?
High
4
Are there business continuity plans for functions or roles that are being significantly reduced or consolidated?
Medium
5
Has the new organisational structure been clearly communicated — with updated reporting lines, roles, and responsibilities?
High
6
Are there early warning indicators in place to detect if the restructuring is not delivering expected savings or performance improvements?
High
7
Has the leadership team been reinforced — through new hires, promotions, or interim appointments — to fill gaps created by the restructuring?
High
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Restructuring Design & Scope
Legal & HR Compliance
Communication & Change Management
Execution & Post-Restructuring Stability
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
21
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT AUDIT Strategy | Financial | Risk management | HR/People
Systematic assessment of how effectively a business under pressure is identifying, engaging, and managing its key stakeholders — including investors, creditors, customers, employees, and regulators. Poor stakeholder management is one of the most common causes of turnaround failure.
AUDIT PHASE 1 OF 4

Stakeholder Identification & Mapping

🎯
SCOPE
Evaluate whether all critical stakeholders have been identified, their interests and influence assessed, and a management approach defined for each.
👤
TARGET
CEO, CFO, Interim Manager, Board
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Has a complete stakeholder map been built, covering all parties with influence over or interest in the business outcome?
High
Missing a significant stakeholder — a major creditor, a key regulator, an influential shareholder — creates blind spots.
DATA SOURCE Stakeholder register, management interviews
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
For each key stakeholder, is their primary interest (financial return, supply continuity, employment, regulatory compliance) understood and documented?
High
3
Has each stakeholder been assessed for their level of influence and their current disposition (supportive, neutral, hostile)?
High
4
Are there stakeholders who have not been engaged yet but whose support or neutrality is required for the plan to succeed?
High
5
Are there conflicting interests between stakeholders — for example, shareholders wanting value protection while creditors want repayment — that must be managed?
Medium
6
Is there a named owner for each critical stakeholder relationship — not a committee, but a specific individual?
Medium
7
Has the stakeholder map been updated in the last 30 days to reflect changes in position, new parties, or resolved risks?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 2 OF 4

Financial Stakeholder Management

🎯
SCOPE
Assess the quality and frequency of engagement with banks, investors, and major creditors — the stakeholders with the most immediate ability to accelerate or prevent business failure.
👤
TARGET
CFO, CEO, Board
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Have all secured creditors been briefed on the current situation, the recovery plan, and the expected timeline to resolution?
High
Secured creditors who feel excluded from communication become hostile faster than those who are kept informed.
DATA SOURCE Bank and creditor meeting log
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Is there a regular reporting rhythm — weekly or bi-weekly — with the primary banking relationship, including a current cash flow model?
High
3
Have waiver agreements or covenant amendments been secured where existing debt covenants are in breach?
High
4
Are major trade creditors being managed on a structured payment plan — communicated clearly and adhered to consistently?
High
5
Have shareholders or investors been updated on the situation with sufficient frequency and honesty?
High
6
Is there a legal advisor engaged who is monitoring the company's obligations to creditors under insolvency law?
High
7
Are there any creditors who are actively threatening legal action, and what is the plan to resolve or contain this?
High
AUDIT PHASE 3 OF 4

Customer & Supplier Stakeholder Management

🎯
SCOPE
Evaluate how effectively the business is managing its key commercial relationships — protecting revenue from customer defection and supply continuity from supplier withdrawal.
👤
TARGET
CEO, Sales Director, Operations Director
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Have the top 10 customers been personally contacted by a senior leader to provide reassurance about supply continuity?
High
Key customers need to hear from a senior person, not a sales manager. Silence from the top creates anxiety and exit.
DATA SOURCE Key account contact log, customer meeting records
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Are there customer contracts that include change-of-control, insolvency, or material adverse change clauses that could be triggered?
High
3
What percentage of revenue is at risk from customers who are aware of the company's financial difficulty?
High
4
Are critical suppliers — those without whom operations would stop within 30 days — identified and actively managed?
High
5
Have key suppliers been given honest information about the company's situation, with a clear commitment to payment?
High
6
Are there supplier retention risks — threats to stop delivery, demands for prepayment or cash on delivery — that have been identified and addressed?
High
7
Is there a contingency plan for losing a critical supplier — an alternative source, an inventory buffer, a substitute product?
Medium
AUDIT PHASE 4 OF 4

Employee & Board Stakeholder Management

🎯
SCOPE
Assess the quality of engagement with the internal stakeholder groups — the board, management team, and workforce — who determine whether execution succeeds or fails.
👤
TARGET
CEO, HR Director, Board Chair
SELECT PHASE
0 of 7 answered 0%
AUDIT QUESTIONS
1
Is the board receiving accurate, timely, and complete information — including bad news — without filtering by management?
High
Boards that are managed rather than informed cannot fulfil their governance role. Selective disclosure is a governance failure.
DATA SOURCE Board papers, board meeting records
Finding / Answer
SCORE
2
Does the board have the right composition — relevant expertise, sufficient independence, appropriate time commitment — for a turnaround situation?
High
3
Are employees being kept informed with sufficient honesty and regularity to prevent rumour-driven anxiety?
High
4
Are key employees — those whose loss would significantly damage recovery prospects — identified and on retention arrangements?
High
5
Is the senior management team aligned on the plan and the messaging — are they communicating consistently to their teams?
High
6
Are there internal 'influencers' — respected individuals below senior management level — who are engaged and supportive of the recovery direction?
Medium
7
Is there a mechanism for employees to raise concerns confidentially — without fear of career consequences?
Medium
📊
Score Summary
Rate each area 1–5 based on audit findings
1 = Critical     5 = Healthy
Stakeholder Identification & Mapping
Financial Stakeholder Management
Customer & Supplier Stakeholder Management
Employee & Board Stakeholder Management
OVERALL AUDIT SCORE
22
High-risk findings
 
Lowest score
Highest score
error: Content is protected !!